Wrong Pi and Gamma with XITS
I get double struck instead of regular ones. \setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext $\mathit{Γ\quadΠ}$ \stoptext -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I get double struck instead of regular ones.
\setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext $\mathit{Γ\quadΠ}$ \stoptext
This was fixed a while back. Not sure if Hans released a beta after that. IIRC, in math-map.lua table.merge needs to be changed to table.merged (or vice versa?) Aditya
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:18:07PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I get double struck instead of regular ones.
\setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext $\mathit{Γ\quadΠ}$ \stoptext
This was fixed a while back. Not sure if Hans released a beta after that. IIRC, in math-map.lua table.merge needs to be changed to table.merged (or vice versa?)
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm testing against texlive-2010 pretest. -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:18:07PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I get double struck instead of regular ones.
\setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext $\mathit{Γ\quadΠ}$ \stoptext
This was fixed a while back. Not sure if Hans released a beta after that. IIRC, in math-map.lua table.merge needs to be changed to table.merged (or vice versa?)
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm testing against texlive-2010 pretest.
This bug was fixed two weeks back, and as such is not fixed in TL. @Taco: Does it deserve a hotfix in TL? It is just a change of two lines. Aditya
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
@Taco: Does it deserve a hotfix in TL? It is just a change of two lines.
Sure, if you send me tested patch against TL10/pretest (I don't run pretest any more, and I don't trust copying files from the current beta).
See attached patch, for the Gamma and Pi as well as the corrected definition of \mathgreekitalic. (I tested with Cambria rather than xits, but that should not matter here). Aditya
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
@Taco: Does it deserve a hotfix in TL? It is just a change of two lines.
Sure, if you send me tested patch against TL10/pretest (I don't run pretest any more, and I don't trust copying files from the current beta).
See attached patch, for the Gamma and Pi as well as the corrected definition of \mathgreekitalic.
Thanks, applied. best wishes, Taco
On 14-7-2010 11:22, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm testing against texlive-2010 pretest.
Already months ago texlive 2010 was frozen and therefore the context on it is one of a few month ago. I get the impression that other tex macro packages keep updating but we keep frozen. After all, it's a snapshot and users can update any time. We could of course push a recent version but the luatex binary used on tl is not the latest and we don't want to enter testing new cache code in tl 2010 now. So .. do no use the tl 2010 version as benchmark (esp not for things that evolve due to fixes in the engine, improved insight, more benchmark fonts, etc). Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:47AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 14-7-2010 11:22, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm testing against texlive-2010 pretest.
Already months ago texlive 2010 was frozen and therefore the context on it is one of a few month ago. I get the impression that other tex macro packages keep updating but we keep frozen. After all, it's a snapshot and users can update any time. We could of course push a recent version but the luatex binary used on tl is not the latest and we don't want to enter testing new cache code in tl 2010 now.
AFAIK, texlive 2010 freeze will start from tomorrow, so it was not frozen before. -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:47AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 14-7-2010 11:22, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm testing against texlive-2010 pretest.
Already months ago texlive 2010 was frozen and therefore the context on it is one of a few month ago. I get the impression that other tex macro packages keep updating but we keep frozen. After all, it's a snapshot and users can update any time. We could of course push a recent version but the luatex binary used on tl is not the latest and we don't want to enter testing new cache code in tl 2010 now.
AFAIK, texlive 2010 freeze will start from tomorrow, so it was not frozen before.
Yes, but the TL binary freeze is much sooner (and for good reason). Freezing luatex effectively freezes ConTeXt MkIV. Bugfixes and new features must be added selectively to pretest, which makes testing much harder.
participants (4)
-
Aditya Mahajan
-
Hans Hagen
-
Khaled Hosny
-
Taco Hoekwater