... and a rather odd bug, too! \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext Some text \goto{text with footnote\footnote{here it is} showing the bug}[hook] \page[yes] Some text \reference[hook] referenced from before. \stoptext See how the word "footnote" is superscripted ... it's an odd bug indeed, and it almost seems the footnote can detect the previous word ... -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
On lundi, déc 16, 2002, at 22:33 Europe/Paris, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
... and a rather odd bug, too!
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext Some text \goto{text with footnote\footnote{here it is} showing the bug}[hook] \page[yes] Some text \reference[hook] referenced from before. \stoptext
Also it seems that instead of \reference[hook] referenced... one has to put \reference[hook]{} referenced... ^^^^ since otherwise in the resulting typeset "referenced..." becomes "eferenced...". Is this the normal use of the command "\reference[xxx]" ? Otared Kavian
At 11:50 PM 12/16/2002 +0100, you wrote:
On lundi, déc 16, 2002, at 22:33 Europe/Paris, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
... and a rather odd bug, too!
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext Some text \goto{text with footnote\footnote{here it is} showing the bug}[hook] \page[yes] Some text \reference[hook] referenced from before. \stoptext
this has to do with the text passed to goto being submitted to quite rigourous manipulations; footnotes are inserts and inserts, like marks and other funny nodes often spoil things, so here the solution is it to carry over the footnote: \def\donaar#1[#2]% {\dontleavehmode \bgroup \postponefootnotes \doifreferencefoundelse{#2} {\doifelsenothing{#1} {\dosymbolreference{}{}[#2]} {\donaarspace{#1}[#2]}} {\unknownreference{#2}#1\relax}% \relax catches lookahead \egroup \referentieinfo{<}{#2}} You can put this in the file "cont-new.tex" and see if it solves the problem
Also it seems that instead of \reference[hook] referenced... one has to put \reference[hook]{} referenced... ^^^^ since otherwise in the resulting typeset "referenced..." becomes "eferenced...". Is this the normal use of the command "\reference[xxx]" ?
indeed, if you want to refer to something, you use \in {something} [ref] or \at {somepage} [there] and alike; \reference just creates one, taking an argument which is to show up as reference: %D There are three ways of defining a reference: %D %D \pagereference[here] %D \textreference[here]{some text} %D %D the third alternative combines them in: %D %D \reference[here]{some text} Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, December 16, 2002 Otared Kavian wrote: OK> On lundi, déc 16, 2002, at 22:33 Europe/Paris, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
... and a rather odd bug, too!
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext Some text \goto{text with footnote\footnote{here it is} showing the bug}[hook] \page[yes] Some text \reference[hook] referenced from before. \stoptext
OK> Also it seems that instead of OK> \reference[hook] referenced... OK> one has to put OK> \reference[hook]{} referenced... OK> ^^^^ OK> since otherwise in the resulting typeset "referenced..." becomes OK> "eferenced...". OK> Is this the normal use of the command "\reference[xxx]" ? Uh, yes, that was an overlook on my part --use \pagereference instead of \reference if you don't want to attach a text in the reference. The bug is with the \footnote within the \ref. I *think* it might be because the \footnote becomes a reference itself, and it seems that ConTeXt doesn't deal well with refs within refs ... -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
At 10:33 PM 12/16/2002 +0100, you wrote:
... and a rather odd bug, too!
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext Some text \goto{text with footnote\footnote{here it is} showing the bug}[hook] \page[yes] Some text \reference[hook] referenced from before. \stoptext
See how the word "footnote" is superscripted ... it's an odd bug indeed, and it almost seems the footnote can detect the previous word ...
actually, it kind of does, in case of: word \footnote the footnote will be attached to 'word' and word \footnote {} \footnote {} is also handled (some spacing between both notes, since 1 2 looks better than 12); there's lots of those hidden things in context Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> actually, it kind of does, in case of: HH> word \footnote HH> the footnote will be attached to 'word' and HH> word \footnote {} \footnote {} HH> is also handled (some spacing between both notes, since 1 2 looks better HH> than 12); there's lots of those hidden things in context I have to investigate this. Get ready for something cool coming in from me ;) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
See how the word "footnote" is superscripted ... it's an odd bug indeed, and it almost seems the footnote can detect the previous word ...
HH> actually, it kind of does, in case of: HH> word \footnote HH> the footnote will be attached to 'word' and HH> word \footnote {} \footnote {} HH> is also handled (some spacing between both notes, since 1 2 looks better HH> than 12); there's lots of those hidden things in context Ok, I give up: is there some way to do extra manipulation on the previous word? (like, making it a reference, or something) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
At 12:07 PM 12/17/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
See how the word "footnote" is superscripted ... it's an odd bug indeed, and it almost seems the footnote can detect the previous word ...
HH> actually, it kind of does, in case of:
HH> word \footnote
HH> the footnote will be attached to 'word' and
HH> word \footnote {} \footnote {}
HH> is also handled (some spacing between both notes, since 1 2 looks better HH> than 12); there's lots of those hidden things in context
Ok, I give up: is there some way to do extra manipulation on the previous word? (like, making it a reference, or something)
Can you be more explicit on what you want to achieve? Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
Ok, I give up: is there some way to do extra manipulation on the previous word? (like, making it a reference, or something)
HH> Can you be more explicit on what you want to achieve? Consider: This word\footnote{with a footnote} has a footnote Now, when producing DVIs, the foonote number (hyer)linked to the footnote would suffice. When creating PDFs I would prefer the footnote to be turned into a tooltip (this I already did) and the word to be turned into the active area, i.e. a result similar to \tooltip{footnote}{with a footnote}. I can do this by defining a command \xfootnote{word}{with a footnote} that gives either of the two results in each case, but it would be nice if it was possible without changing the sources. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
At 03:19 PM 12/17/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
Ok, I give up: is there some way to do extra manipulation on the previous word? (like, making it a reference, or something)
HH> Can you be more explicit on what you want to achieve? Consider:
This word\footnote{with a footnote} has a footnote
Now, when producing DVIs, the foonote number (hyer)linked to the footnote would suffice. When creating PDFs I would prefer the footnote to be turned into a tooltip (this I already did) and the word to be turned into the active area, i.e. a result similar to \tooltip{footnote}{with a footnote}.
it is still on my agenda to make something generic for that
I can do this by defining a command \xfootnote{word}{with a footnote} that gives either of the two results in each case, but it would be nice if it was possible without changing the sources.
the problem (well not that big a problem since it's seldom needed) is that one cannot look back into the input stream over the word; so indeed something with multiple args is needed, although clicking on some symbols is ok too Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf -------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Giuseppe Bilotta -
Hans Hagen -
Otared Kavian