Dear gang, Why does lmr in ConTeXt use the ec instead of the texnansi encoding? I just noticed that all of my macros that use, e.g., \char'25 are now bringing up the wrong symbols. Shouldn't ConTeXt default to the encoding most consistent with cmr (surely I am not the only one who depended on the old TeX encoding->) Idris ============================ Professor Idris Samawi Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523
ishamid wrote:
Dear gang,
Why does lmr in ConTeXt use the ec instead of the texnansi encoding? I just noticed that all of my macros that use, e.g.,
\char'25
lmr is defined for both ec and texnansi encodings (and even for qx). But ec is default. Use \usetypescript[latin-modern][texnansi] \setupbodyfont[latin-modern] Ishamid, \char is wrong approach since it is encoding-dependent definition. Use glyph name instead, like \endash, \Aacute. But ... your glyph number 25 is not defined in the texnansi. So what it is? vit
ishamid wrote:
Dear gang,
Why does lmr in ConTeXt use the ec instead of the texnansi encoding? I just noticed that all of my macros that use, e.g.,
\char'25
are now bringing up the wrong symbols. Shouldn't ConTeXt default to the encoding most consistent with cmr (surely I am not the only one who depended on the old TeX encoding->)
i'd like to make texnansi default, but unfortunately most other (tex live) fonts ship only in ec encoding Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
h h extern -
ishamid -
Vit Zyka