Hello guys, attached to the following please find a .tar.bz2-packed file containing updated t-amsl and t-nath. Those of you that had any problems, please try these modules. In particular, when you had to use a workaround (e.g. \startnathequation) revert to the original (e.g. \startformula) and check that things now work correctly. If you find any problems and/or find I forgot to apply some patches, please repost your problems/patches as an answer to this email. I'll also send the updates to CTAN. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
* Giuseppe Bilotta
Those of you that had any problems, please try these modules. In particular, when you had to use a workaround (e.g. \startnathequation) revert to the original (e.g. \startformula) and check that things now work correctly. If you find any problems and/or find I forgot to apply some patches, please repost your problems/patches as an answer to this email.
I posted this to another thread, but there's a problem with \longrightarrow: \usemodule[nath] \starttext $A \longrightarrow B$ \stoptext gives ! Undefined control sequence. \dodosmash [#1]->\edef \@@smash {#1}\futurelet \nexttoken \dododosmash \relbar ->\mathrel {\smash -} \longrightarrow ->\relbar \joinrel \rightarrow <argument> A \longrightarrow B \inlinemath ...inemath@ {\noexpand \wrapfrac@ { #1 }} \endgroup \protectinlin... \imath@ ...mathoptions@on \o@math \inlinemath {#1} \o@math \mathoptions@off ... l.19 $A \longrightarrow B$ ? Sorry I couldn't get you this sooner, nikolai -- ::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka ::: ::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden ::: ::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 ::: main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
attached to the following please find a .tar.bz2-packed file containing updated t-amsl and t-nath.
\def\startnathequation{% \begingroup \curr@cr@is@wall@cr \let\startdysplaymath\relax \let\stopdysplaymath\relax \contextstartformula \startnatheq \hbox\bgroup \dmathon@ \wall\mathopen{}% } What is \startdysplaymath? As an aside: Hans, are therespecified naming conventions yet for “internal” macros? I don't expect \contextstartformula and the like to clash with anything, but somehow I still felt more at ease with \nath!startformula. (Then again, that may be bad ConTeXt style inherited from the LaTeX package mess I've worked with way too much.) cu, ccr
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
attached to the following please find a .tar.bz2-packed file containing updated t-amsl and t-nath.
\def\startnathequation{% \begingroup \curr@cr@is@wall@cr \let\startdysplaymath\relax \let\stopdysplaymath\relax \contextstartformula \startnatheq \hbox\bgroup \dmathon@ \wall\mathopen{}% }
What is \startdysplaymath?
As an aside: Hans, are therespecified naming conventions yet for “internal” macros? I don't expect \contextstartformula and the like to clash with anything, but somehow I still felt more at ease with \nath!startformula. (Then again, that may be bad ConTeXt style inherited from the LaTeX package mess I've worked with way too much.)
i'd go for: \NATHstartformula (or better, find out what is needed to let nath work with a not overloaded macro) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, November 19, 2004 Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
attached to the following please find a .tar.bz2-packed file containing updated t-amsl and t-nath.
\def\startnathequation{% \begingroup \curr@cr@is@wall@cr \let\startdysplaymath\relax \let\stopdysplaymath\relax \contextstartformula \startnatheq \hbox\bgroup \dmathon@ \wall\mathopen{}% }
What is \startdysplaymath?
Ugh. That should be \startdisplaymath and \stopdisplaymath. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Hello Giuseppe, Thanks for your good work. Sorry for reminding this bug to you, but it's the only reason why I can't use nath even though I wish a lot. About the problem unicode characters in toc. Ref.: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2004/005306.html I attached a minimal example unicode file. You'll get garbage instead of the expected the "e acute" on the word "Mathématiques" in the table of contents. No matter wheter I use the amsl module or not, I get the following entry in my tuo file: \listentry{section}{1}{1}{Math^^c3^^a9matiques}{2::0:0:1:0:0:0:0::1}{1} Moreover, if you replace [nath] with just [amsl], you'll get different alignment of the formula. BTW: my TeX doesn't seem to like DOS-style newlines in t-amsl.tex, so I had to convert them to Unix-style ones. David
Ok. I got a simpler example (no TOC): \usemodule [nath] \enableregime [utf] \starttext ^^c3^^a9 \stoptext With nath, I get "^^c3^^a9" in the output; without, I get "é". Thanks for any help, David
Monday, November 22, 2004 David Munger wrote:
Ok. I got a simpler example (no TOC):
\usemodule [nath] \enableregime [utf] \starttext ^^c3^^a9 \stoptext
With nath, I get "^^c3^^a9" in the output; without, I get "é".
Try the attached nath module. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
participants (5)
-
Christopher Creutzig -
David Munger -
Giuseppe Bilotta -
Hans Hagen -
Nikolai Weibull