On 2011-03-31 pmlists@free.fr (Peter Münster) wrote:

Steffen Wolfrum writes:

...

\enquote{Needless to say \enquote{mind mapping} is just ...}

And the result looked like this ... “Needless to say ‘mind mapping’ is just ...”

Do we have something like this in ConTeXt too?

\quotation{Needless to say \quote{mind mapping} is just

I think the idea behind Steffens post was not to find a command that does the quoting, rather than finding *one* command that »knows« about the level of quotation and inserts the corresponding quotation marks. Marco

Marco writes:

I think the idea behind Steffens post was not to find a command that does the quoting, rather than finding *one* command that »knows« about the level of quotation and inserts the corresponding quotation marks.

Right. That's why I mentioned also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Quotes -- Peter

Am 31.03.2011 um 16:46 schrieb Marco:

On 2011-03-31 pmlists@free.fr (Peter Münster) wrote:

...

Marco writes:

...

I think the idea behind Steffens post was not to find a command that does the quoting, rather than finding *one* command that »knows« about the level of quotation and inserts the corresponding quotation marks.

Right. That's why I mentioned also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Quotes

My fault, I overlooked that part. But indeed, a very nice definition. I wasn't aware of that.

But be careful: it easily can get confused when becoming *really* nested ... \starttext \setupdelimitedtext [quotation] [1] [left={\symbol[leftquotation]}, right={\symbol[rightquotation]}] \setupdelimitedtext [quotation] [2] [left={\symbol[leftquote]}, right={\symbol[rightquote]}] \setupdelimitedtext [quotation] [3] [left={\symbol[leftquotation]}, right={\symbol[rightquotation]}] Testing, \quotation{A really nested\footnote{Test \quotation{A long quotation in which one character says, \quotation{Eh? What am I supposed to say? Something like, \quotation {Quotations in this sentance are nested}?}} test} quotation}! \stoptext Steffen