Hi, I have \setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)] in the environment. In one place, however, I want to have a one-column itemization. What do I do? I thought that \startitemize[columns,one] would override the environment setting - but it didn't work. I tried to do something like this: \defineitemgroup[onecolumnitemize] \setuponecolumnitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro][stopper=)] but it didn't work - still the settings from \setupitemize[2][...] were in use. What's going on? Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) - Why are vim users so terribly egocentric? - Because they begin every sentence with `I'.
Dnia Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:09:06PM +0100, Marcin Borkowski napisał(a):
Hi,
I have
\setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)]
in the environment. In one place, however, I want to have a one-column itemization. What do I do? I thought that
\startitemize[columns,one]
would override the environment setting - but it didn't work.
I tried to do something like this:
\defineitemgroup[onecolumnitemize] \setuponecolumnitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro][stopper=)]
but it didn't work - still the settings from \setupitemize[2][...] were in use.
What's going on?
Before anyone asks me for an example, here it is: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Mbork (the last part) Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) Jest tak. Friedman ma weksel Schapira z żyrem Glasa i windykator jest Balenstein. On daje dwadzieścia pięć procent franko loko, towar jest u Lutmana, tylko ten towar jest zajęty przez Honigmana z powodu weksel Roitberga. Za ten weksel Roitberga można dostać gwarancję od jego teścia Rozenzweiga, tylko on jest przepisany na Rozenzweigową, a Rozenzweigowa jest chora. (Kabaret Dudek)
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:09:06PM +0100, Marcin Borkowski napisał(a):
Hi,
I have
\setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)]
in the environment. In one place, however, I want to have a one-column itemization. What do I do? I thought that
\startitemize[columns,one]
would override the environment setting - but it didn't work.
I tried to do something like this:
\defineitemgroup[onecolumnitemize] \setuponecolumnitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro][stopper=)]
but it didn't work - still the settings from \setupitemize[2][...] were in use.
What's going on?
Before anyone asks me for an example, here it is: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Mbork (the last part)
concerning the intro ... mixed one-two column modes are somewhat tricky and have limitations (if only because tex itself has no concept of columns); when mkiv is further down the road i'll look into multi columns and see if i can provide more control, but for that i need to implement a few other things first nested itemizations are currently not possible (or more precisely: they are (they are intercepted simply because there is no guarantee that all varianst work); however you can say \startitemize[n=1] at the second level and get just one column then ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Dnia Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:40:07AM +0100, Hans Hagen napisał(a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:09:06PM +0100, Marcin Borkowski napisał(a):
Hi,
I have
\setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)]
in the environment. In one place, however, I want to have a one-column itemization. What do I do? I thought that
\startitemize[columns,one]
would override the environment setting - but it didn't work.
I tried to do something like this:
\defineitemgroup[onecolumnitemize] \setuponecolumnitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro][stopper=)]
but it didn't work - still the settings from \setupitemize[2][...] were in use.
What's going on?
Before anyone asks me for an example, here it is: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Mbork (the last part)
concerning the intro ... mixed one-two column modes are somewhat tricky and have limitations (if only because tex itself has no concept of columns); when mkiv is further down the road i'll look into multi columns and see if i can provide more control, but for that i need to implement a few other things first
nested itemizations are currently not possible (or more precisely: they are (they are intercepted simply because there is no guarantee that all varianst work); however you can say \startitemize[n=1] at the second level and get just one column then
Thank you - this sort of clarifies my continuous problems with two-column itemizations: it seems that they just won't work now (at least not in the context (!) where I need them). I'll be waiting patiently for progress in luatex;). However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page). Please do not think that I am angry at you, Hans, or anything like that; I really admire your (and not only your) work with ConTeXt. But I am a bit disappointed - and hope that itemizations will eventually work. And now I guess I'll have to work this around in some nasty way (most probably, I'll just do the only one-column itemization by hand). And you may be pretty sure that I will be a good beta-tester for the itemization stuff - as I already told, I use itemizations a lot, together with math, nesting itemizations, two-column ones etc. For the purpose of testing any new things in this area I'm leaving the examples on my user page, too. PS. Looking back at the steady progress of ConTeXt & luatex, I am pretty sure that this _will_ be solved in finite time anyway, so I can just \relax, wait and then test and provide feedback;). Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) - Gandalf! A ja myślałem, że nie żyjesz. Co prawda o sobie też byłem tego zdania. Sam Gamgee
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page).
[n=1]
Please do not think that I am angry at you, Hans, or anything like that; I really admire your (and not only your) work with ConTeXt. But I am a bit disappointed - and hope that itemizations will eventually work. And now I guess I'll have to work this around in some nasty way (most probably, I'll just do the only one-column itemization by hand).
well, although tex can do a lot, there are limitations; column related stuff for instance is a matter of programming all possible aspects of it; and there can be conflicting demands
And you may be pretty sure that I will be a good beta-tester for the itemization stuff - as I already told, I use itemizations a lot, together with math, nesting itemizations, two-column ones etc. For the purpose of testing any new things in this area I'm leaving the examples on my user page, too.
ok; but as mentioned before only mkiv will have improved itemizations
PS. Looking back at the steady progress of ConTeXt & luatex, I am pretty sure that this _will_ be solved in finite time anyway, so I can just \relax, wait and then test and provide feedback;).
thanks Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Dnia Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Hans Hagen napisał(a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page).
[n=1] I tried
============================================================== \setupitemize[1][n,intro] \setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)] \starttext \startitemize \item Item one \item Sub-itemize: \startitemize \item sub-one \item sub-two \item sub-three \item sub-four \stopitemize \item Sub-itemize with one column: \startitemize[n=1] \item A \item B \item C \stopitemize \stopitemize \stoptext ============================================================== on the online ConTeXt (MkIV). Didn't work...
Please do not think that I am angry at you, Hans, or anything like that; I really admire your (and not only your) work with ConTeXt. But I am a bit disappointed - and hope that itemizations will eventually work. And now I guess I'll have to work this around in some nasty way (most probably, I'll just do the only one-column itemization by hand).
well, although tex can do a lot, there are limitations; column related stuff for instance is a matter of programming all possible aspects of it; and there can be conflicting demands
I believe that. Nested itemizations (possibly with columns) are definitely non-trivial.
And you may be pretty sure that I will be a good beta-tester for the itemization stuff - as I already told, I use itemizations a lot, together with math, nesting itemizations, two-column ones etc. For the purpose of testing any new things in this area I'm leaving the examples on my user page, too.
ok; but as mentioned before only mkiv will have improved itemizations
I know, I've already installed MkIV on my texlive.
PS. Looking back at the steady progress of ConTeXt & luatex, I am pretty sure that this _will_ be solved in finite time anyway, so I can just \relax, wait and then test and provide feedback;).
thanks
Well, it's just true:).
Hans
Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) - Why are vim users so terribly egocentric? - Because they begin every sentence with `I'.
Am 06.11.2008 um 17:24 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Dnia Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Hans Hagen napisał (a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page).
[n=1] I tried
============================================================== \setupitemize[1][n,intro] \setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)]
\setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns][stopper=)] If you want more than two columns by default add "n=x" to the third argument but don't use the keywords (one, two, ...).
\starttext \startitemize \item Item one \item Sub-itemize: \startitemize \item sub-one \item sub-two \item sub-three \item sub-four \stopitemize \item Sub-itemize with one column: \startitemize[n=1]
You could write \startitemize[n=1] or \startitemize[one]
\item A \item B \item C \stopitemize \stopitemize \stoptext
Wolfgang
Dnia Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 05:43:29PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(a):
Am 06.11.2008 um 17:24 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Dnia Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Hans Hagen napisał (a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
However, I tried \startitemize[1] and it didn't work (neither at my computer nor in online ConTeXt, with the example I have provided on my user page).
[n=1] I tried
============================================================== \setupitemize[1][n,intro] \setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns,two][stopper=)]
\setupitemize[2][a,paragraph,intro,columns][stopper=)]
If you want more than two columns by default add "n=x" to the third argument but don't use the keywords (one, two, ...).
\starttext \startitemize \item Item one \item Sub-itemize: \startitemize \item sub-one \item sub-two \item sub-three \item sub-four \stopitemize \item Sub-itemize with one column: \startitemize[n=1]
You could write \startitemize[n=1] or \startitemize[one]
WOW!!! It *works*!!! TTTTT H H AAA N N K K SSSS !! T H H A A NN N K K S !! T HHHHH AAAAA N N N KK SSSS !! T H H A A N N N K K S T H H A A N NN K K SSSS !! -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) Jezus żyje NAPRAWDĘ. A Ty?
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I tried \item Sub-itemize with one column: \startitemize[n=1] \item A \item B \item C \stopitemize \stopitemize \stoptext
on the online ConTeXt (MkIV). Didn't work...
ok, i run an experimental version here; so then you have to wait till the update (will be rather drastic this time, so needs some testing here first) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Marcin Borkowski -
Wolfgang Schuster