![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5a39f1335b6eff433673ed987859fb24.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Are there users of ConTeXt plus JabRef?
---
Hello,
JabRef is an open-source software for bibliographic management.
To foster its developments, the JabRef core team is conducting a survey:
https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
We are interested in getting your opinion (whether you are currently a
user or you decided to move to another software).
The survey is open up to November 14, and consists of 3 sets of questions:
- What do you think about the current features?
- Which new features should be included?
- Who are JabRef users?
It will take between 15 and 30 minutes to complete.
See: https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
The survey is anonymous, and the server is hosted by a research
institute (Inra, France). If you have any question regarding this
survey, please feel free to contact me:
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Are there users of ConTeXt plus JabRef?
Thanks a lot for the link. I loved the software, but then stopped using it because it was too latex-centric at the time and I had to switch to ConTeXt-specific input. Now I'm using "plain bibtex" as input again, so it might be closer to my needs and maybe getting sufficient feedback from ConTeXt users could trigger better support in the future. Mojca
--- Hello,
JabRef is an open-source software for bibliographic management. To foster its developments, the JabRef core team is conducting a survey: https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
We are interested in getting your opinion (whether you are currently a user or you decided to move to another software).
The survey is open up to November 14, and consists of 3 sets of questions: - What do you think about the current features? - Which new features should be included? - Who are JabRef users? It will take between 15 and 30 minutes to complete. See: https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
The survey is anonymous, and the server is hosted by a research institute (Inra, France). If you have any question regarding this survey, please feel free to contact me:
Thank you for your time!
Frédéric Darboux, for the JabRef core team
Additional information about JabRef - http://jabref.sourceforge.net/ - http://github.com/JabRef/jabref - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JabRef
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ac3fbaf0a287c4cffbc9f18fa931586c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi,
I have written about JabRef in the soon to be distributed ConTeXt
bibliography subsystem documentation.
It is a fair program, but can ruin your bibtex data files if you are
not careful. Answering Mojca's comment, jabref is highly configurable,
so one could eventually make a decent ConTeXt configuration.
The main problem, from my point of view, is that jabref, as configured
by default, does not respect the "standard" (original) bibtex
definitions, and seems rather adapted for some flavors of biblatex that
has strayed from such standard uses. Nevertheless, jabref is a good
starting point or tool that can be used to convert, say, EndNote
exported reference lists to bibtex format.
Of course, java is not supported on all tablets and smartphones, as far
as I understand, so it is slowly being replaced by other languages. I
saw this recently for some teaching tools that are being re-written in
HTML5 (a stumbling block for these has been jmol that is sometimes used
for chemistry and biochemistry applications).
Alan
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:17:25 +0200
Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Are there users of ConTeXt plus JabRef?
Thanks a lot for the link. I loved the software, but then stopped using it because it was too latex-centric at the time and I had to switch to ConTeXt-specific input. Now I'm using "plain bibtex" as input again, so it might be closer to my needs and maybe getting sufficient feedback from ConTeXt users could trigger better support in the future.
Mojca
--- Hello,
JabRef is an open-source software for bibliographic management. To foster its developments, the JabRef core team is conducting a survey: https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
We are interested in getting your opinion (whether you are currently a user or you decided to move to another software).
The survey is open up to November 14, and consists of 3 sets of questions: - What do you think about the current features? - Which new features should be included? - Who are JabRef users? It will take between 15 and 30 minutes to complete. See: https://enquetes.inra.fr/index.php?sid=29749
The survey is anonymous, and the server is hosted by a research institute (Inra, France). If you have any question regarding this survey, please feel free to contact me:
Thank you for your time!
Frédéric Darboux, for the JabRef core team
Additional information about JabRef - http://jabref.sourceforge.net/ - http://github.com/JabRef/jabref - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JabRef
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr
participants (3)
-
Alan BRASLAU
-
Henning Hraban Ramm
-
Mojca Miklavec