I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error: \usemodule[tikz] \starttext Hello World \stoptext The error is: system > tex > error on line 129 in file example.tex: Undefined control sequence ... l.129 \catcode`\;=\active Obviously there is no line 129. A quick greg shows that the likely suspect is: tex\texmf-modules\tex\generic\pgf\utilities\pgffor.code.tex:129 Is this the best place to report this, or should I drop a mail to the Tikz/PGF list? Felix
On 17-1-2012 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote:
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz] \starttext Hello World \stoptext
The error is:
system> tex> error on line 129 in file example.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
l.129 \catcode`\;=\active
Obviously there is no line 129. A quick greg shows that the likely suspect is: tex\texmf-modules\tex\generic\pgf\utilities\pgffor.code.tex:129
Is this the best place to report this, or should I drop a mail to the Tikz/PGF list?
You can add this to cont-new.mkiv .. I'll keep it there for a while till the context tikz loader is fixed. (actually \catcode`\;=13 would be quite ok too) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote:
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz] \starttext Hello World \stoptext
The error is:
system > tex > error on line 129 in file example.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
l.129 \catcode`\;=\active
Obviously there is no line 129. A quick greg shows that the likely suspect is: tex\texmf-modules\tex\generic\pgf\utilities\pgffor.code.tex:129
Is this the best place to report this, or should I drop a mail to the Tikz/PGF list?
It's complicated because I'm not aware of any major TikZ developer using ConTeXt. The main question is: is this a recent problem in TikZ or in ConTeXt? Usually people on this list might know how to fix problems, but then you need to convince pgf team to accept patches. (And then Aditya started contributing and collecting some patches independently.) I didn't follow development of ConTeXt too closely, but I'm lead to believe that \active has disappeared from ConTeXt MKIV. Others will have to correct me if I'm wrong - I didn't check ConTeXt sources. And others will have to make suggestion about what to do about this. Patching might as easy as adding \def\active{13} somewhere on top of TikZ sources, but it might help to understand why Hans decided to remove the \active command if that is true. On the other hand (completely unrelated), I just realized that the following commit (unofficial and unreliable temporary repository): https://github.com/mojca/pgf/commit/418b278dcf6a2193d0d564d9d85194bdce1e505e only fixes LaTeX and plain TeX and doesn't fix ConTeXt. I don't know what the patch is about, but I'm lead to believe that the same patch might be needed in ConTeXt as well if it is needed for the other two. Mojca
Hello Mojca, thanks for the follow-up.
2012/1/17 Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote:
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz] \starttext Hello World \stoptext
The error is:
system > tex > error on line 129 in file example.tex: Undefined control sequence ...
l.129 \catcode`\;=\active
Obviously there is no line 129. A quick greg shows that the likely suspect is: tex\texmf-modules\tex\generic\pgf\utilities\pgffor.code.tex:129
Is this the best place to report this, or should I drop a mail to the Tikz/PGF list?
It's complicated because I'm not aware of any major TikZ developer using ConTeXt.
The main question is: is this a recent problem in TikZ or in ConTeXt? Usually people on this list might know how to fix problems, but then you need to convince pgf team to accept patches. (And then Aditya started contributing and collecting some patches independently.)
If they aren't yet in the official repo, I would be happy to add those patches. Note that I'm not a ConTeXt user, so I won't be able to test them carefully.
I didn't follow development of ConTeXt too closely, but I'm lead to believe that \active has disappeared from ConTeXt MKIV. Others will have to correct me if I'm wrong - I didn't check ConTeXt sources. And others will have to make suggestion about what to do about this. Patching might as easy as adding \def\active{13} somewhere on top of TikZ sources, but it might help to understand why Hans decided to remove the \active command if that is true.
I add it to my todo list.
On the other hand (completely unrelated), I just realized that the following commit (unofficial and unreliable temporary repository): https://github.com/mojca/pgf/commit/418b278dcf6a2193d0d564d9d85194bdce1e505e only fixes LaTeX and plain TeX and doesn't fix ConTeXt. I don't know what the patch is about, but I'm lead to believe that the same patch might be needed in ConTeXt as well if it is needed for the other two.
Not sure if it is needed for ContTeXt because I added the required file on top of pgffor.code.tex that is loaded by any format one use. I did add a \RequirePackage to the .sty file because LaTeX manages a list of package loaded. I would be happy to do the same for ConTeXt if it has a similar mechanism. Best regards -- Christophe
2012/1/17 Christophe Jorssen
If they aren't yet in the official repo, I would be happy to add those patches. Note that I'm not a ConTeXt user, so I won't be able to test them carefully.
which ones? all those in mojca’s repo https://github.com/mojca/pgf? because getting them into mainline tikz would be awesome. some gems like thishttp://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/27952/cmyk-context-colors-in-tikz#279...already made ithttp://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=752792&aid=3407097&group_id=142562into the cvs, but we have still qite some bugs that are only fixed in mojca’s repo. (e.g. matrices are still unusable if you don’t do \unprotect\ReadFile{pgfmodulematrix.code.tex}\protect after loading the tikz module afaik) http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/27952/cmyk-context-colors-in-tikz#279...
Adding the \def\active{13} statement to the sources seems to fix
things for the time being. All of my graphics appear to have shifted
to the right by leftmarginwidth but I can correct for that. I believe
that someone else had a similar issue (Daniel Edwards in a mail sent
on 14 Jan 2012).
Oh, and suffix={ --} no longer works for setupcaption but I can
survive without that for the moment.
Thanks all for the help,
Felix
On 18 January 2012 11:54, Philipp A.
2012/1/17 Christophe Jorssen
If they aren't yet in the official repo, I would be happy to add those patches. Note that I'm not a ConTeXt user, so I won't be able to test them carefully.
which ones? all those in mojca’s repo?
because getting them into mainline tikz would be awesome. some gems like this already made it into the cvs, but we have still qite some bugs that are only fixed in mojca’s repo. (e.g. matrices are still unusable if you don’t do \unprotect\ReadFile{pgfmodulematrix.code.tex}\protect after loading the tikz module afaik)
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Felix Ingram
Adding the \def\active{13} statement to the sources seems to fix things for the time being. All of my graphics appear to have shifted to the right by leftmarginwidth but I can correct for that. I believe that someone else had a similar issue (Daniel Edwards in a mail sent on 14 Jan 2012).
Oh, and suffix={ --} no longer works for setupcaption but I can survive without that for the moment.
You can try with this temporary patch \unprotect\def\c!suffixstopper{}\protect just in the beginning of you file -- luigi
On 17-1-2012 16:28, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I didn't follow development of ConTeXt too closely, but I'm lead to believe that \active has disappeared from ConTeXt MKIV. Others will have to correct me if I'm wrong - I didn't check ConTeXt sources. And others will have to make suggestion about what to do about this. Patching might as easy as adding \def\active{13} somewhere on top of TikZ sources, but it might help to understand why Hans decided to remove the \active command if that is true.
It's one of those traditional plain tex commands, but it's also one of those commands that is sensitive for being redefined by a user; another one is \letter (a command one could imagine to be used in the letter module). Maybe some more will go in the process of cleaning up. The longer internal names already are around for a while. I'll add an \active definition to cont-new.tex for a while Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (6)
-
Christophe Jorssen -
Felix Ingram -
Hans Hagen -
luigi scarso -
Mojca Miklavec -
Philipp A.