Hi Hans, I run into my favorite error with the latest beta ("this can't happen"). The document uses a SabonNext font, but I get similar results with other fonts. The error message is: tex error > tex error on line 855 in file /home/tas/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/cont-yes.mkiv: ! This can't happen (fuzzy token cleanup in node) \page_shipouts_normal ...box \shipoutscratchbox }} \else \page_shipouts_ignor... \page_boxes_shipout ... {\box \shipoutscratchbox } \fi \setnextrealpageno \th... \page_otr_construct_and_shipout ...cted_page #1#2} \page_otr_flush_pending_co... \page_sides_output_routine_nop ...de_float_output \global \d_page_sides_vsiz... \page_sides_output_routine ..._output_routine_nop \fi \page_otr_triggered_output_routine ...and_routine \fi ... l.97 \getvalue{clf_processjob} % from cont-run.lua mtx-context | fatal error: return code: 1% An older context version (2016.02.08 15:35) processes the same file without problems, so I suspect it may be the newer luatex binary. I can't produce a minimal example right now, the error is a bit unpredictable. All best Thomas
On 4/15/2016 6:36 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Hans,
I run into my favorite error with the latest beta ("this can't happen"). The document uses a SabonNext font, but I get similar results with other fonts. The error message is:
tex error > tex error on line 855 in file /home/tas/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/cont-yes.mkiv: ! This can't happen (fuzzy token cleanup in node)
\page_shipouts_normal ...box \shipoutscratchbox }} \else \page_shipouts_ignor... \page_boxes_shipout ... {\box \shipoutscratchbox } \fi \setnextrealpageno \th... \page_otr_construct_and_shipout ...cted_page #1#2}
\page_otr_flush_pending_co... \page_sides_output_routine_nop ...de_float_output \global \d_page_sides_vsiz... \page_sides_output_routine ..._output_routine_nop \fi \page_otr_triggered_output_routine ...and_routine \fi ... l.97 \getvalue{clf_processjob} % from cont-run.lua
mtx-context | fatal error: return code: 1%
An older context version (2016.02.08 15:35) processes the same file without problems, so I suspect it may be the newer luatex binary. I can't produce a minimal example right now, the error is a bit unpredictable.
Do you have a minimal test (maybe some specific typographic feature triggers it)? It probably is some oversight .. i mess up a list ... we merged glue specs into glue nodes which is much cleaner (the last big thing before luatex 1.0). Probably not hard to solve. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen
-
Thomas A. Schmitz