setupbars - ntg-context - NTG Mailing Lists

newer
unknown library lmodern

setupbars

older
two more bugs in latest

Meer, H. van der

8 Jul 2012 8 Jul '12

2:24 p.m.

This gives an error: \starttext \setupbars[rulethickness=4pt] \stoptext ! LuaTeX error <main ctx instance>:1: malformed number near '4pt'. ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{} Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5 whereas in pack-rul.mkiv: \c!rulethickness=\linewidth I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API. Hans van der Meer

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Wolfgang Schuster

8 Jul 8 Jul

2:44 p.m.

Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

This gives an error:

\starttext \setupbars[rulethickness=4pt] \stoptext

! LuaTeX error <main ctx instance>:1: malformed number near '4pt'. ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english

Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{} Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5 whereas in pack-rul.mkiv: \c!rulethickness=\linewidth

I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API.

\setupbars[rulethickness=0.5] \starttext \setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex} \setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em} \stoptext Wolfgang

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Meer, H. van der

3:40 p.m.

Thansk, I see. \setupbars doesn't give a hit on ConTeXt-wiki, so I couldn't find this. Still I dare say, it is a pity that [rulethickness=] gets a different meaning here than elsewhere. I would like to ask to reconsider, because I strongly believe in consistency in the API (though I am ready to admit that it is not easy to maintain and confess guilty myself at more than one occasion). That is either change all rulethickness's everywhere to this scheme or otherwise. Or did this already happened and did I miss that? And of course, the easiest solution would be if the code itself could sort out the difference between having been given a fraction or a length. Hans van der Meer On 8 jul. 2012, at 22:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der: This gives an error: \starttext \setupbars[rulethickness=4pt] \stoptext ! LuaTeX error <main ctx instance>:1: malformed number near '4pt'. ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{} Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5 whereas in pack-rul.mkiv: \c!rulethickness=\linewidth I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API. \setupbars[rulethickness=0.5] \starttext \setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex} \setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em} \stoptext Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Meer, H. van der

9 Jul 9 Jul

1:09 a.m.

There is still an issue here. \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does. Question: why does "ex" qualify as a dimension unit but "pt" and "mm" do not? Sounds strange. If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made possible? Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known beforehand. Hans van der Meer On 8 jul. 2012, at 23:40, Meer, H. van der wrote: Thansk, I see. \setupbars doesn't give a hit on ConTeXt-wiki, so I couldn't find this. Still I dare say, it is a pity that [rulethickness=] gets a different meaning here than elsewhere. I would like to ask to reconsider, because I strongly believe in consistency in the API (though I am ready to admit that it is not easy to maintain and confess guilty myself at more than one occasion). That is either change all rulethickness's everywhere to this scheme or otherwise. Or did this already happened and did I miss that? And of course, the easiest solution would be if the code itself could sort out the difference between having been given a fraction or a length. Hans van der Meer On 8 jul. 2012, at 22:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der: This gives an error: \starttext \setupbars[rulethickness=4pt] \stoptext ! LuaTeX error <main ctx instance>:1: malformed number near '4pt'. ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{} Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5 whereas in pack-rul.mkiv: \c!rulethickness=\linewidth I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API. \setupbars[rulethickness=0.5] \starttext \setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex} \setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em} \stoptext Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl http://www.pragma-ade.nl/ / http://tex.aanhet.net http://tex.aanhet.net/ archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net http://contextgarden.net/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Wolfgang Schuster

1:26 a.m.

Am 09.07.2012 um 09:09 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

There is still an issue here.

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf

The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does. Question: why does "ex" qualify as a dimension unit but "pt" and "mm" do not? Sounds strange.

If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made possible? Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known beforehand.

The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options for the “unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm” etc. as unit value or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”. Wolfgang

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.

1:38 a.m.

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:26:51 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.

+1 Lukas

Wolfgang

-- Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:LPr@pontex.cz] Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pontex@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz] Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Tel: +420 244 062 238 Fax: +420 244 461 038

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Bill Meahan

9:35 a.m.

On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:26:51 +0200 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options for the “unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm” etc. as unit value or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.

Wolfgang

It proposal has my vote! -- Bill Meahan, Westland, Michigan USA “Writing is a combination of intangible creative fantasy and appallingly hard work.” —Anthony Powell This message is digitally signed with an X.509 certificate to prove it is from me and has not been altered since it was sent.

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

4:16 p.m.

On 9-7-2012 09:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Am 09.07.2012 um 09:09 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

...
There is still an issue here.

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf

The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does. Question: why does "ex" qualify as a dimension unit but "pt" and "mm" do not? Sounds strange.

If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made possible? Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known beforehand.

The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options for the “unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm” etc. as unit value or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.

actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an 1/u) anyhow, in the next beta we can do \starttext \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \stoptext but someone has do document it ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.

10 Jul 10 Jul

7:25 a.m.

... OK - On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:16:08 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:

actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an 1/u)

anyhow, in the next beta we can do

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank

\stoptext

Although it's meaningless, what would \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank ^^ ^^ produce? Will the following setups be valid in the next beta? \setupbars[rulethickness=1mm] \setupbars[rulethickness=1cm] \setupbars[rulethickness=1in] \setupbars[rulethickness=1ex] \setupbars[rulethickness=1pt] \setupbars[rulethickness=1bp] Best regards, Lukas -- Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:LPr@pontex.cz] Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pontex@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz] Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Tel: +420 244 062 238 Fax: +420 244 461 038

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

8:31 a.m.

On 10-7-2012 15:25, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:

... OK -

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:16:08 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:

...
actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an 1/u)

anyhow, in the next beta we can do

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank

\stoptext

Although it's meaningless, what would

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank ^^ ^^

produce?

Will the following setups be valid in the next beta?

\setupbars[rulethickness=1mm] \setupbars[rulethickness=1cm] \setupbars[rulethickness=1in] \setupbars[rulethickness=1ex] \setupbars[rulethickness=1pt] \setupbars[rulethickness=1bp]

the unit is uses for consistent stacking of nested bars; in the case of a unit with rulethickness that one is used for the rules, otherwise the general unit is applied to the rulethickness Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4390

Age (days ago)

4392

Last active (days ago)

Download

9 comments

5 participants

tags

participants (5)

Bill Meahan
Hans Hagen
Meer, H. van der
Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.
Wolfgang Schuster