Formula numbering conversion
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6eee225810f6c2c9d70b6b59889636a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. \setupformulas[conversion=characters] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ? Any help is welcome. Thank you in advance, Antoine C.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5955e8e90611e77ccbfc7721b6112027.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote:
The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. [...] Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ?
Hi Antoine, it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”): \setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for future reference. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6eee225810f6c2c9d70b6b59889636a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thanks.
I updated the wiki.
On 27 February 2017 at 17:18, Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote:
The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. [...] Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ?
Hi Antoine,
it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”):
\setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext
BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for future reference.
Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ____________________________________________________________ _______________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________ _______________________
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6eee225810f6c2c9d70b6b59889636a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I try to replicate the following : https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2006/021038.html (i.e. the equivalent of \tag in latex/amsmath). More precisely this:
%------------------------8<-------------------------- \def\placeformulatag% {\dosingleempty\doplaceformulatag} \def\doplaceformulatag[#1]#2% {\let\normalstopformula\stopformula \def\stopformula% {\normalstopformula \restorenumber[formula] \egroup \let\stopformula\normalstopformula} \bgroup \savenumber[formula] \def\dummyconversion##1{#2} \defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion] \setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion] \placeformula[#1]}
\starttext \placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula See \in formula[tag] for a tagged formula \stoptext %----------------------------8<-------------------------
However, the following (simpler) code produce an "Undefined control sequence" when using \in command. \starttext
{ \def\a#1{test} \defineconversion[a][\a] \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula } This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. \stoptext
The following code, does not produce the error, but is not practical for the reproducing the \tag command.
\starttext { \def\a#1{test} \defineconversion[a][\a] \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. } \stoptext
What am I doing wrong? I guess the command \a is no longer defined when the
compiler hit \in but how can I ensure that such local definition stay
accessible ?
Thank you in advance,
Antoine C.
On 27 February 2017 at 17:28, Antoine Cailliau
Thanks.
I updated the wiki.
On 27 February 2017 at 17:18, Pablo Rodriguez
wrote: On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote:
The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. [...] Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ?
Hi Antoine,
it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”):
\setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext
BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for future reference.
Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ____________________________________________________________ _______________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list info/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________ _______________________
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6eee225810f6c2c9d70b6b59889636a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Does anyone have a tip for me? I really want these tags in my document.
Many thanks in advance,
On 27 February 2017 at 19:22, Antoine Cailliau
I try to replicate the following : https://mailman.ntg.nl/ pipermail/ntg-context/2006/021038.html (i.e. the equivalent of \tag in latex/amsmath). More precisely this:
%------------------------8<-------------------------- \def\placeformulatag% {\dosingleempty\doplaceformulatag} \def\doplaceformulatag[#1]#2% {\let\normalstopformula\stopformula \def\stopformula% {\normalstopformula \restorenumber[formula] \egroup \let\stopformula\normalstopformula} \bgroup \savenumber[formula] \def\dummyconversion##1{#2} \defineconversion[dummyconversion][\dummyconversion] \setupformulas[conversion=dummyconversion] \placeformula[#1]}
\starttext \placeformulatag[tag]{test} \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula See \in formula[tag] for a tagged formula \stoptext %----------------------------8<-------------------------
However, the following (simpler) code produce an "Undefined control sequence" when using \in command.
\starttext
{ \def\a#1{test} \defineconversion[a][\a] \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula } This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. \stoptext
The following code, does not produce the error, but is not practical for the reproducing the \tag command.
\starttext { \def\a#1{test} \defineconversion[a][\a] \setupformulae[numberconversion=a] \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula This is my reference: \in{formula}[test]. } \stoptext
What am I doing wrong? I guess the command \a is no longer defined when the compiler hit \in but how can I ensure that such local definition stay accessible ?
Thank you in advance,
Antoine C.
On 27 February 2017 at 17:28, Antoine Cailliau
wrote: Thanks.
I updated the wiki.
On 27 February 2017 at 17:18, Pablo Rodriguez
wrote: On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote:
The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. [...] Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ?
Hi Antoine,
it’s numberconversion (as it reads in “ConTeXt Commands”):
\setupformulas[numberconversion=greek] \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext
BTW, if this is wrong documented in the wiki, please correct it for future reference.
Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ____________________________________________________________ _______________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list info/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ____________________________________________________________ _______________________
participants (2)
-
Antoine Cailliau
-
Pablo Rodriguez