Numbering in mathalignment not working
Hi, [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36] I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested. The following example does not produce the expected result (sample attached): both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is – \starttext \placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula \stoptext Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed? I ran into this when I compiled a large maths-heavy document and while proof- reading noticed numerous missing references to statements inside mathalignment. Please advise me on how I might fix/workaround this. Thank you, Sreeram
It's true. In the version that comes with TeXlive 2021 (2021.03.05)
this numbering works fine, but not with the 2022.05.11.
L. Montgomery
El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 3:34, śrīrāma via ntg-context (
Hi,
[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.
The following example does not produce the expected result (sample attached): both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stoptext
Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
I ran into this when I compiled a large maths-heavy document and while proof- reading noticed numerous missing references to statements inside mathalignment. Please advise me on how I might fix/workaround this.
Thank you,
Sreeram___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
Hi,
[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.
The following example does not produce the expected result both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stoptext
Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed? [...]
Hi, Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am stuck with documents without equation numbers. As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first equation is numbered (while both should be) \placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail. Thanks, Sreeram Sreeram
Same issue with
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[number=auto]
\NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+]
\NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).
L. Montgomery
El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context (
On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
Hi,
[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside
mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.
The following example does not produce the expected result both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stoptext
Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed? [...]
Hi,
Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am stuck with documents without equation numbers.
As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first equation is numbered (while both should be)
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
Thanks, Sreeram
Sreeram
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:35 AM Luis Montgomery via ntg-context
Same issue with
\placeformula \startformula \startalign[number=auto] \NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+] \NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula
and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).
L. Montgomery
El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context (
) escribió: On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
Hi,
[I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are requested.
The following example does not produce the expected result both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stoptext
Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work as expected. Has its behaviour changed? [...]
Hi,
Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am stuck with documents without equation numbers.
As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first equation is numbered (while both should be)
\placeformula \startformula \startmathalignment \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one] \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two] \stopmathalignment \stopformula I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
Thanks, Sreeram
Sreeram
It has been fixed, but we have to wait for the next upload. /Mikael
participants (3)
-
Luis Montgomery
-
Mikael Sundqvist
-
śrīrāma