Hello, a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE It would be nice, if something like the following could work: \starttext \bTABLE \bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD \bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
� wrote:
Hello, a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE It would be nice, if something like the following could work:
\starttext \bTABLE \bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext
Cheers, Peter
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
\bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR
I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that does not work. Strange... Thank you, Hans! Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
� wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
\bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR
I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that does not work. Strange...
not if you imagine that we have \def\bTABLE[#1==options]#2\eTABLE and something #2 can handle {nested stuff} but in the case of a \bgroup it means that #2==\bgroup etc etc Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Peter Münster