Dear Everyone, We currently have the Context Garden site, wiki and htis list for documentation and resources. There is a Github contextgarden organization that can host repositories. What about creating a repository called: 'templates' or 'resources' - we can figure out the exact name later. The idea behind it is to collect templates and examples that are scattered all over the web or in the list threads. The first example that comes to my mind is the type definition for a Roboto font I needed and other type scripts that can be useful for the community. Then there are templates for books, slides or documents. The Repository has a wiki where we could add some notes about more complex items. It is not about duplicating the Context garden site but to collect code in a place where we could gradually fix possible errors or introduce improvements. All the best, Pawel
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Pawel Urbanski via ntg-context wrote:
What about creating a repository called: 'templates' or 'resources' - we can figure out the exact name later.
Why not use the wiki for such documents? For fonts, there is already a wiki page collecting typescripts: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Typescripts_examples There are also a collection of templates which are already on the wiki: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Category:Sample_documents
It is not about duplicating the Context garden site but to collect code in a place where we could gradually fix possible errors or introduce improvements.
This can be done on the wiki as well. Aditya
Am 25.04.23 um 17:13 schrieb Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Pawel Urbanski via ntg-context wrote:
What about creating a repository called: 'templates' or 'resources' - we can figure out the exact name later.
Why not use the wiki for such documents? For fonts, there is already a wiki page collecting typescripts:
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Typescripts_examples
There are also a collection of templates which are already on the wiki:
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Category:Sample_documents
It is not about duplicating the Context garden site but to collect code in a place where we could gradually fix possible errors or introduce improvements.
This can be done on the wiki as well.
I agree that it makes most sense to keep examples and (font) setups in the wiki. Projects with several files, like modules, should have their own (git) repositories. (The scripts at modules.contextgarden.net can pull releases directly from a repository.) I think it’s better to have (and manage) your own account somewhere and link to it from the wiki than to use the “official” account for stuff that is not part of ConTeXt proper. My stuff is at https://codeberg.org/fiee/; some of that would also make (more) sense in the wiki. Hraban
participants (3)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Henning Hraban Ramm -
Pawel Urbanski