Bib module produces no output
Hello, bib module of 30-8-2004 produces no bibliography list on \placepublications with ConTeXt 2004.12.17 (last stable) and/or latest beta. The workaround is to use \setuplist[pubs][criterium=all] somewhere in the setup. Can you please make including the whole bibliography make the default? I'm pretty sure that's what everybody expects :-) Thanks, D.A. -- Women have a wonderful instinct about things. They can discover everything except the obvious. -- Oscar Wilde: An Ideal Husband
This item has remained on my todo list because the 'criterium=all' seemed at the time to be a bug in context itself. Will fix soon. David Antos wrote:
Hello,
bib module of 30-8-2004 produces no bibliography list on \placepublications with ConTeXt 2004.12.17 (last stable) and/or latest beta.
The workaround is to use \setuplist[pubs][criterium=all] somewhere in the setup.
Can you please make including the whole bibliography make the default? I'm pretty sure that's what everybody expects :-)
Thanks, D.A.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:58:15PM +0100, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
This item has remained on my todo list because the 'criterium=all' seemed at the time to be a bug in context itself. Will fix soon.
Hello, thanks, nevertheless, more things seem to be broken with lists now. I often use \setupcombinedlist [content] [alternative=c] It should (and used to) produce a list with dot leaders between names and page numbers. It doesn't in the last stable. (I've tried to look into core-lst, but it's too complicated for me :-) Alternatives a, b, and c produce number-title-spaces-pagenumber, d, e, f, and g seem to be correct. Can you please have a look? Thanks, D.A. -- Sir Humphrey: "The purpose of minutes is not to record events, it is to protect people." -- Yes, Prime Minister (Official Secrets)
Hi David,
Alternatives a, b, and c produce number-title-spaces-pagenumber, d, e, f, and g seem to be correct.
Can you please have a look?
ah, some dutch left-overs in the interface translation: search for variant in core-lst,tex: \def\@@lialternativea% nr - tit - pag {\def\lijstfill{\hskip .25em}% omdat nu check \def\lijstskip{0em}% \def\lijstwidth{2em}} \def\@@lialternativeb% nr - tit - fill - pag {\def\lijstfill{\hfill}% was \hskip.5em\hfill \def\lijstskip{5em}% \def\lijstwidth{2em}} \def\@@lialternativec% nr - tit - dots - pag {\def\lijstfill{\hskip.5em\lijstdots\hskip.5em}% \def\lijstskip{5em}% \def\lijstwidth{0pt}} \def\@@lialternative {\@@lialternativeb} \@@lialternativeb (even better: \setvalue{\??li\c!alternative a}% ....) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Hans, On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:17:34PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Alternatives a, b, and c produce number-title-spaces-pagenumber, d, e, f, and g seem to be correct.
Can you please have a look?
ah, some dutch left-overs in the interface translation:
search for variant in core-lst,tex:
sorry, I don't follow you :-(. What I'm saying is that alternatives a, b, and c produce the same result (equal to `b' setting). I expect this to expand to the macros you've cited in the end, so I expect that \setupcombinedlist [content] [alternative=c] should work.
\def\@@lialternative {\@@lialternativeb}
\@@lialternativeb
(even better: \setvalue{\??li\c!alternative a}% ....)
OK, how should this help? I've tried all of them in the setup (with other alternatives like a or c, too), only the first \def goes without error and has no effect, though. Thanks and sorry for being a bit slow, D.A. -- Q: How many hardware engineers does it take to change a lightbulb? A: None. We'll fix it in software.
David Antos wrote:
...
\def\@@lialternative {\@@lialternativeb}
\@@lialternativeb
(even better: \setvalue{\??li\c!alternative a}% ....)
just move that code into core-lst.tex (search for 'variant' to locate the old versions)
OK, how should this help? I've tried all of them in the setup (with other alternatives like a or c, too), only the first \def goes without error and has no effect, though.
when patched, regenerate the format [so effectively, in the code, '*variantc' becomes '*alternativec']
Thanks and sorry for being a bit slow,
no problem, Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
David Antos wrote:
Can you please make including the whole bibliography make the default? I'm pretty sure that's what everybody expects :-)
Definitely not. I don't know about you, but I'd very much prefer to use the same .bib file for different articles/texts. Numerous groups in this and other universities even use a collective .bib file for all the researchers. (We are just doing too diverse things in this group for that.) rgeards, Christopher Creutzig
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:00:51AM +0100, Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Definitely not. I don't know about you, but I'd very much prefer to use the same .bib file for different articles/texts. Numerous groups in this and other universities even use a collective .bib file for all the researchers. (We are just doing too diverse things in this group for that.)
Hello, don't worry, that is not the point. What I wanted is to include all bibliographies cited in the work, not just the current chapter (which is empty if you have a separate "bibliography chapter"). It has nothing to do with choosing the entries from .bib file. This should include cited entries only and all entries as an option (as we're used to). D.A. -- In host we trust -- Cheswick, Bellowin, Rubin: Firewalls and Internet Security
David Antos wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:00:51AM +0100, Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Definitely not. I don't know about you, but I'd very much prefer to use the same .bib file for different articles/texts. Numerous groups in this and other universities even use a collective .bib file for all the researchers. (We are just doing too diverse things in this group for that.)
Hello,
don't worry, that is not the point. What I wanted is to include all bibliographies cited in the work, not just the current chapter (which is empty if you have a separate "bibliography chapter").
It has nothing to do with choosing the entries from .bib file. This should include cited entries only and all entries as an option (as we're used to).
i an look into it but then i need some files [indeed a minimal example] to test with; i don't have bib tex files and/or files using them on my system Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Christopher Creutzig -
David Antos -
Hans Hagen -
Taco Hoekwater