Question regarding context's module defintion
Are users supposed to use %D kind of remarks to comment their own environment files? I am finding it a bit strange to work with. Does one have to leave a blank line after a %D line for that line to appear? Consider the test file %D \module %D [file=test.tex, %D version=0.0, %D title=Test File, %D subtitle=Blah blah, %D author=Aditya Mahajan, %D date=\currentdate] %D Explaination for the next macro does not work \def\test{test} %D \macros{test} %D Neither does this. \def\test{test} %D Leaving a blank space also works \def\test{test} ----------------------- and look at the output of texmfstart texexec --modules test.tex. Why are the first two macro definitions not in the pdf? Aditya
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Are users supposed to use %D kind of remarks to comment their own environment files? I am finding it a bit strange to work with. Does
well, it has been so for a long time; originally there were also %S lines for the formal command definitions anyhow, the %D is used to signal text that wil be typeset in a 'documentation run' in the editor that i use, i can remove/add %D's on a selection, so it's no real burden
one have to leave a blank line after a %D line for that line to appear?
no, but it's just that i like a spacy layout; if it does not work, then there is a bug in ctxtools
Consider the test file %D \module %D [file=test.tex, %D version=0.0, %D title=Test File, %D subtitle=Blah blah, %D author=Aditya Mahajan, %D date=\currentdate]
%D Explaination for the next macro does not work \def\test{test}
%D \macros{test} %D Neither does this. \def\test{test}
%D Leaving a blank space also works
\def\test{test}
-----------------------
and look at the output of texmfstart texexec --modules test.tex. Why are the first two macro definitions not in the pdf?
in ctxtools.rb, locate: inlocaldocument = indocument inlocaldocument = false # else first line skipped when not empty please test all kind of variants (there most have been a reason for this, so it may as well be a bug related to translating from perl to ruby) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Are users supposed to use %D kind of remarks to comment their own environment files? I am finding it a bit strange to work with. Does
well, it has been so for a long time; originally there were also %S lines for the formal command definitions
anyhow, the %D is used to signal text that wil be typeset in a 'documentation run'
in the editor that i use, i can remove/add %D's on a selection, so it's no real burden
one have to leave a blank line after a %D line for that line to appear?
no, but it's just that i like a spacy layout; if it does not work, then there is a bug in ctxtools
[code deleted]
and look at the output of texmfstart texexec --modules test.tex. Why are the first two macro definitions not in the pdf?
in ctxtools.rb, locate:
inlocaldocument = indocument inlocaldocument = false # else first line skipped when not empty
please test all kind of variants (there most have been a reason for this, so it may as well be a bug related to translating from perl to ruby)
From the code, I can not understand why inlocaldocument is there. Setting indocument to false works as expected. This is equivalent to removing inlocaldocument completely (the unless inlocaldocument is always run). I will do some more elaborate tests to check is anything breaks.
Should the test-suite contain tests for ruby scripts also? Aditya
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Should the test-suite contain tests for ruby scripts also?
for some of the functionality that makes sense indeed Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Hans Hagen