XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)
Dear list, I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX. Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s. This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times. I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different spacing gives different page numbers. I wonder whether this might be an issue. Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX.
Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for that document? I assume that you time multiple runs.
This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
On the average LMTX should be faster than MKIV (and definitely not 20% slower). I assume it's regular luatex?
I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different spacing gives different page numbers.
Not sure where that comes from. There are no fundamental changes wrr spacing.
I wonder whether this might be an issue. Hard to say without a MWE that exposes the same
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 6/2/19 2:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...] Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for that document? I assume that you time multiple runs.
No, it isn’t the first time I compare and I time multiple runs.
This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
On the average LMTX should be faster than MKIV (and definitely not 20% slower). I assume it's regular luatex?
Sorry, this was my fault. I thought I was running luatex and it was luajittex. MkIV times with luatex are 51.x seconds, which is a tiny bit faster than LMTX (52.x seconds). But this is perfectly normal.
I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different spacing gives different page numbers.
Not sure where that comes from. There are no fundamental changes wrr spacing.
Font expansion (as reported in https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2019/095175.html).
I wonder whether this might be an issue. Hard to say without a MWE that exposes the same
Sorry for the noise, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 6/2/2019 3:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Font expansion (as reported in https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2019/095175.html).
font expansion is always slower (but i admit that i never use it) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen -
Pablo Rodriguez