Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/30ef4fea8acc9a4c7a392675260cfcb9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
6 Jun
2010
6 Jun
'10
4:23 p.m.
+1 for \section [number=no] {Introduction} This was my first guess to try, and it is so convinient! :) -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/80f20446bd67141930cccea5e373f00d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
7 Jun
7 Jun
4 p.m.
New subject: Removing Introduction section number
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky (2010-06-07 01:23):
+1 for \section [number=no] {Introduction}
This was my first guess to try, and it is so convinient!
:)
This is similar to what I was (intuitively) trying out first, when tackling this same problem last week... Couldn't \section[]{} keep accepting the reference label in the square brackets, and support more comma separated options (for case by case option adjustment, as Alan mentioned)? -- -- Rogutės Sparnuotos
5153
Age (days ago)
5154
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Rogutės Sparnuotos
-
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky