Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of course... I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but unfortunately I don't know metafun yet. If my understanding of https://source.contextgarden.net/node-rul.mkiv is correct, it should be possible to build upon the defintion of rules:under:dots (l. 327) Any hints how I could get this started? Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version? Best, Denis

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Taco Hoekwater Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 14:19 An: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

...

On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:

Hi,

for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.

- A normal underbar - A dotted underbar - A combination of both

Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above the normal bar.

I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.

As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, \underdash, \underrandom ...) would be really cool.

Either with \xxxxbar or a nestable dy-shift version of textbackgrounds would be really handy sometimes. :)

...

This is not working

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \starttext

\underbar{asdf}

\underdot{asdf}

\underbar{\underdot{asdf}}

\stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Best, Denis

__________________________________________________________ ____________

...

_____________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

__________________________________________________________ ____________

...

_____________

— Taco Hoekwater E: taco@bittext.nl genderfluid (all pronouns)

Ok, so I will see. But, if even you gave up, I should better hope that someone else hears our desperate cries ;) Denis

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Taco Hoekwater Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 14:52 An: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

...

On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:

Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of course...

I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but unfortunately I don't know metafun yet.

If my understanding of https://source.contextgarden.net/node-rul.mkiv is correct, it should be possible to build upon the defintion of rules:under:dots (l. 327) Any hints how I could get this started?

Yes, that is the right part to get started with. You could just copy the whole \startuseMPgraphic and rename it for editing (to let’s say rules:under:bardots), then do

\definebar[underbardot] [undergraphic][mp=rules:under:bardots]

and play with the mp until you are happy with the output.

But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I tried something like that a while ago and basically gave up. I did not want to spend a whole of time on it so I just told the client “computer says no").

...

Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version?

Nested bars have a parameter ‘dy’ which controls the vertical shifts needed to make sure that they do not overlap. Text backgrounds do not have that option at all.

...

Best, Denis

...

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Taco Hoekwater Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 14:19 An: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

...

On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:

Hi,

for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.

- A normal underbar - A dotted underbar - A combination of both

Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above the normal bar.

I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.

As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, \underdash, \underrandom ...) would be really cool.

Either with \xxxxbar or a nestable dy-shift version of textbackgrounds would be really handy sometimes. :)

...

This is not working

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \starttext

\underbar{asdf}

\underdot{asdf}

\underbar{\underdot{asdf}}

\stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Best, Denis

__________________________________________________________

...

...

____________

...

_____________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

---

...

...

____________

...

_____________

— Taco Hoekwater E: taco@bittext.nl genderfluid (all pronouns)

__________________________________________________________ ____________

...

_____________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

__________________________________________________________ ____________

...

_____________

— Taco Hoekwater E: taco@bittext.nl genderfluid (all pronouns)

On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:

...

On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote:

Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of course...

I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but unfortunately I don't know metafun yet.

If my understanding of https://source.contextgarden.net/node-rul.mkiv is correct, it should be possible to build upon the defintion of rules:under:dots (l. 327) Any hints how I could get this started?

Yes, that is the right part to get started with. You could just copy the whole \startuseMPgraphic and rename it for editing (to let’s say rules:under:bardots), then do

\definebar[underbardot] [undergraphic][mp=rules:under:bardots]

and play with the mp until you are happy with the output.

But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I tried something like that a while ago and basically gave up. I did not want to spend a whole of time on it so I just told the client “computer says no").

...

Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version?

Nested bars have a parameter ‘dy’ which controls the vertical shifts needed to make sure that they do not overlap. Text backgrounds do not have that option at all.

i've added that so one can nest the mp driven ones but still within the same category ... i'll look into a mix (more complex management wise so typically a rainy weekend thing; i know how to do it but ...) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I tried something like that a while ago and basically gave up. I did not want to spend a whole of time on it so I just told the client “computer says no"). a new experience ... taco and giving up ... (probably when you'd told

On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote: the client that it would take a few hours it suddenly became less important -) anyway, attached what happens with two different classes ... i didn't even test more than two as it's 'undefined behaviour' and when you need that you should revert to old school typewriter typesetting Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------