It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead of the ratio operator, as it is now? The latter is rather rare in pure math, and in addition, it seems to have been reversed in the implementation with ∶ RATIO U+2236, cf. example below. \setupbodyfont[xits,10pt] \startformula \startalign \NC f\NC\colon A→B \NR % Produces ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC: A→B \NR % : COLON U+003A \NC f\NC ∶ A→B \NR % ∶ RATIO U+2236 \stopalign \stopformula
On 5/31/2016 4:18 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead of the ratio operator, as it is now? The latter is rather rare in pure math, and in addition, it seems to have been reversed in the implementation with ∶ RATIO U+2236, cf. example below.
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\startformula \startalign \NC f\NC\colon A→B \NR % Produces ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC: A→B \NR % : COLON U+003A \NC f\NC ∶ A→B \NR % ∶ RATIO U+2236 \stopalign \stopformula
it's a commented option i.e. we decided not to do that because the normal colon would be obscured then (just like overloading a period is not realistic) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 31 May 2016, at 17:04, Hans Hagen
wrote: On 5/31/2016 4:18 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead of the ratio operator, as it is now?
it's a commented option
What does that mean?
i.e. we decided not to do that because the normal colon would be obscured then (just like overloading a period is not realistic)
But can one not have it only in math, the way you suggested before, as in the code below? Anyway, for Unicode fonts that support RATIO U+2236, input : COLON U+003A should properly give that RATIO in the output, and \colon should output a COLON. :-) \setupbodyfont[xits,10pt] \appendtoks \catcode`:=\activecatcode \letcharcode `: \colon \to \everymathematics \starttext Note: the colon in text should behave normally. \startformula \startalign \NC f\NC\colon A→B \NR % Outputs ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC: A→B \NR % : COLON U+003A, outputs ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC ∶ A→B \NR % ∶ RATIO U+2236 \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext
On 5/31/2016 5:53 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 31 May 2016, at 17:04, Hans Hagen
wrote: On 5/31/2016 4:18 PM, Hans Åberg wrote:
It is possible to get the symbol : COLON U+003A to expand to \colon, instead of the ratio operator, as it is now?
it's a commented option
What does that mean?
that it has been considered but rejected already
i.e. we decided not to do that because the normal colon would be obscured then (just like overloading a period is not realistic)
But can one not have it only in math, the way you suggested before, as in the code below?
so what about (1:2) and so? do we really always want that colon symbol?
Anyway, for Unicode fonts that support RATIO U+2236, input : COLON U+003A should properly give that RATIO in the output, and \colon should output a COLON. :-)
\setupbodyfont[xits,10pt]
\appendtoks \catcode`:=\activecatcode \letcharcode `: \colon \to \everymathematics
You love active characters yes? Try to avoid them. More efficient is: \Umathcode"3A="6"00"002236 % : to \colon in one of your styles
\starttext
Note: the colon in text should behave normally. \startformula \startalign \NC f\NC\colon A→B \NR % Outputs ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC: A→B \NR % : COLON U+003A, outputs ∶ RATIO U+2236 \NC f\NC ∶ A→B \NR % ∶ RATIO U+2236 \stopalign \stopformula
\stoptext
could be a style (or option) but then more for a set of such symbols, not for just one Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen
-
Hans Åberg