ConTeXters, The following example demonstrates an issue with the ELECTRONIC bib type: \startbuffer[TestBib] @ELECTRONIC{Edited, editor = {An Editor}, title = {A title}, url = {http://www.example.com}, year = {2017}, } @ELECTRONIC{Authored, author = {An Author}, title = {Another title}, url = {http://www.example.com}, year = {2017}, } \stopbuffer \loadbtxdefinitionfile[apa] \usebtxdefinitions [apa] \usebtxdataset [TestBib.buffer] \definebtxrendering [Pubs][apa] \enabletrackers[publications.authorhash] \starttext \nocite[*] \placelistofpublications[Pubs] \stoptext Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice to have a fix. -- Rik
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500
Rik Kabel
Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice to have a fix.
Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic. It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection, and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the standard tools used for maintaining bib files. Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry either in the APA Specifications describing this. Alan -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr
On 2017-02-24 19:31, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500 Rik Kabel
wrote: Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice to have a fix. Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic. It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection, and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the standard tools used for maintaining bib files.
Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry either in the APA Specifications describing this.
Alan
Sorry. You are, of course, right about that. I misread the table in mkiv-publications. The problem I have is that all non-author electronic entries are grouped at the top of the bibliography by date. However, APA for electronic entries with no author should use the title (or a few salient words from the text) at the beginning of the bibliography entry. Currently ConTeXt uses a blank space and the date. -- Rik
participants (2)
-
Alan Braslau
-
Rik Kabel