No metapost compilation on files named file.001.tex
Hello, There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok. I attach the test file used if it can be useful. Regards, BG
Yes, that's a known problem. Have a look at this thread: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/ 20050912.154547.be0e5d5c.en.html Does it work with newtexexec? Thomas On Apr 20, 2006, at 12:14 AM, nico wrote:
Hello,
There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok.
I attach the test file used if it can be useful.
Regards, BG
_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
nico wrote:
Hello,
There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok.
I attach the test file used if it can be useful. works here; do you use the latest (new)texexec?
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
nico wrote:
Hello,
There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok.
I attach the test file used if it can be useful.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:34:49 +0200, Thomas A. Schmitz
Yes, that's a known problem. Have a look at this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/ 20050912.154547.be0e5d5c.en.html
Does it work with newtexexec?
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:57:11 +0200, Hans Hagen
works here; do you use the latest (new)texexec?
The problem appears only for the old perl texexec. Testing with the ruby one does not produce the problem. I guess it's a problem with the OS: in the thread the problem occured on OS X, and I've the trouble on a FreeBSD machine (and OS X is FreeBSD). BTW, sorry for that stupid question, but is there a safe or recommended way to install and use newtexexec? For testing I only did ruby /usr/local/share/texmf-local/scripts/context/ruby/newtexexec.rb try2.001.tex. Regards, BG
nico wrote:
nico wrote:
Hello,
There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok.
I attach the test file used if it can be useful.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:34:49 +0200, Thomas A. Schmitz
wrote: Yes, that's a known problem. Have a look at this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/ 20050912.154547.be0e5d5c.en.html
Does it work with newtexexec?
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:57:11 +0200, Hans Hagen
wrote: works here; do you use the latest (new)texexec?
The problem appears only for the old perl texexec. Testing with the ruby one does not produce the problem. I guess it's a problem with the OS: in the thread the problem occured on OS X, and I've the trouble on a FreeBSD machine (and OS X is FreeBSD).
BTW, sorry for that stupid question, but is there a safe or recommended way to install and use newtexexec? For testing I only did ruby /usr/local/share/texmf-local/scripts/context/ruby/newtexexec.rb try2.001.tex.
export TEXMFSTART_MODE=experimental (or adapt the texexec stub) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen
-
nico
-
Thomas A. Schmitz