All, Both this: %output=pdf \starttext We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$. \stoptext And this: %output=pdf \starttext We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$. \stoptext Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any ideas?
<--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote --->
All,
Both this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
And this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any ideas?
I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better? \starttext \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$. \stoptext HTH, Aditya -- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008
I don't know either what the goal is, when I want to place a figure left to the text I use \startfiguretext etc. Matthias On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
<--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote --->
All,
Both this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
And this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any ideas?
I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better?
\starttext \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
HTH, Aditya
-- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Aditya, Thanks, this worked. On Mar 21, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
<--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote --->
All,
Both this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
And this:
%output=pdf
\starttext
We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any ideas?
I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better?
\starttext \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$.
\stoptext
HTH, Aditya
-- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
participants (3)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
David Arnold -
Matthias Weber