![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4371f028079eba71984ea33b851a4448.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, thanks for your feedback. Again, I don't want to impose or dismiss anything. I wanted to share this because I believed somebody else in the ConTeXt community could be interested. @Taco: Actually, I stumbled upon the nice ConTeXt group logo recently and was wondering who made it. To answer your questions: I tried to avoid any logic or rainbow-type color sequence to create something more unique. The first square had to be in blue and the middle area in a warm color. (I played around a lot with the color combinations.) Regarding the outside circle: I tried different variations, with and without a surrounding circle or round background, with and without rounded squares, and was most pleased with this solution. It's true, "clean and simple" can easily lead to "too informal". @Clyde J: Valid point. I use the logotype with the subscript 'E' whenever I can in inline text. @Floris vM: Font, spacing, overall appealingness. No Helvetica/Nimbus Sans, which has less meaning to me for ConTeXt than a DIN-ish/technical one. Colors are fun. If you don't see it this way, it's perfectly fine. @Alan B: I've uploaded MetaPost files of the main version. Yes, the horizontal version is not very exciting nor very TeX-aware. I made this one primarily because I wanted something small for a little GUI script. Now I think it's just superfluous. Greetings! Paul
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/aaec8862a4c7f861ffc1f105419e1805.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
@Floris vM: Font, spacing, overall appealingness. No Helvetica/Nimbus Sans, which has less meaning to me for ConTeXt than a DIN-ish/technical one. Colors are fun.
Could you elaborate on how ‘fun’ in colors is defined? I see no coherency in the color palet.
If you don’t see it this way, it’s perfectly fine.
Apparently i see different ;-) How about a one color logo without any text? .F
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/aaec8862a4c7f861ffc1f105419e1805.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
If TeX and Context are about typesetting beautiful readable typography, the logos as presented do not reflect that thought per se. At first glance is is a pile of incoherent letters and colours. e.g. difficult to read and memorise. .F
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, While this discussion is going on, it is still the case that Paul’s new unofficial logo is better than the old green one, so I did in fact replace the wiki logo. It will stay up until someone comes up with a proposal with a higher level of consensus. Thanks Paul! Taco PS I tried replacing the favicon as well, but the image does not want to scale down that much, so the favicon is still Patrick’s tulips.
On 30 Jan 2019, at 10:15, Floris van Manen
wrote: If TeX and Context are about typesetting beautiful readable typography, the logos as presented do not reflect that thought per se. At first glance is is a pile of incoherent letters and colours. e.g. difficult to read and memorise.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, Just a quick note on logo design: The ConTeXt logo could just as well be a set of tulips or some (TeX-styled) lion or a dutch cow or a windmill or some variation off the Pragma-ADE logo (see pragma-ade.com). There is no real need to display the letters “context”. In fact, having a pictograph instead of / along with textual content is probably a good idea. For use in actual text we already have \CONTEXT. My 2c, Taco
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/46562c7d27388490d62e8d7a5bc960dd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 1/30/2019 10:31 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick note on logo design:
The ConTeXt logo could just as well be a set of tulips or some (TeX-styled) lion or a dutch cow or a windmill or some variation off the Pragma-ADE logo (see pragma-ade.com). There is no real need to display the letters “context”.
In fact, having a pictograph instead of / along with textual content is probably a good idea.
For use in actual text we already have \CONTEXT.
My 2c, ok, let me add 1c ... since 2011 in the distribution there is always a file context-version.[pdf|png] which is a colorful representation of the current context version (date and time) ... probably no one ever noticed it (at some point i dropped the icon file)
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a0f6b595b0e3b7f3abba19eeb8261fc2.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:02:32PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
ok, let me add 1c ... since 2011 in the distribution there is always a file context-version.[pdf|png] which is a colorful representation of the current context version (date and time) ... probably no one ever noticed it
I did! I did! :-) Arthur
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:15 AM Floris van Manen
If TeX and Context are about typesetting beautiful readable typography, the logos as presented do not reflect that thought per se. At first glance is is a pile of incoherent letters and colours. e.g. difficult to read and memorise.
perhaps a gradient on background can suggest the right orientation of reading. -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/aaec8862a4c7f861ffc1f105419e1805.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:15 AM Floris van Manen
wrote: If TeX and Context are about typesetting beautiful readable typography, the logos as presented do not reflect that thought per se. At first glance is is a pile of incoherent letters and colours. e.g. difficult to read and memorise. perhaps a gradient on background can suggest the right orientation of reading.
Making things complex is easy. The challenge remains to find a simple solution.
In fact, having a pictograph instead of / along with textual content is probably a good idea.
I do agree ;-) Here’s an attempt the blend the lines in plain monochrome … The latter having a naive reference to the typical TeX letter dropping e.g. always room for improvement ;-) .F
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5aa6984b53b8925e405ebbdbc051ad9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 2019-01-30 um 11:09 schrieb Floris van Manen
In fact, having a pictograph instead of / along with textual content is probably a good idea.
I do agree ;-)
Here’s an attempt the blend the lines in plain monochrome … The latter having a naive reference to the typical TeX letter dropping
I like this. There could even be an animated version that links the twi versions (and would work in (Lua)iTeX, of course). Greetlings, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d6e7462bd4209f9c4cd08271985a50df.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello,
thanks Paul for the nice job! The colorful hexa-shaped logo seems much prettier.
One point/suggestion - if the letters "TEX" shared the same background - be it e.g. light gray - it might be cleaner how to read ("discover") the word "ConTeXt"; it would also keep the hexagonal shape, associating chemistry; and it would also indicate or highlight relation to "TeX".
But keep my notion or feeling just personal; the new logo is "nice enough" as published on wiki.
Best regards,
Lukas
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:58:40 +0100, Paul Schalck
Hello,
thanks for your feedback. Again, I don't want to impose or dismiss anything. I wanted to share this because I believed somebody else in the ConTeXt community could be interested.
@Taco: Actually, I stumbled upon the nice ConTeXt group logo recently and was wondering who made it. To answer your questions: I tried to avoid any logic or rainbow-type color sequence to create something more unique. The first square had to be in blue and the middle area in a warm color. (I played around a lot with the color combinations.) Regarding the outside circle: I tried different variations, with and without a surrounding circle or round background, with and without rounded squares, and was most pleased with this solution. It's true, "clean and simple" can easily lead to "too informal".
@Clyde J: Valid point. I use the logotype with the subscript 'E' whenever I can in inline text.
@Floris vM: Font, spacing, overall appealingness. No Helvetica/Nimbus Sans, which has less meaning to me for ConTeXt than a DIN-ish/technical one. Colors are fun. If you don't see it this way, it's perfectly fine.
@Alan B: I've uploaded MetaPost files of the main version.
Yes, the horizontal version is not very exciting nor very TeX-aware. I made this one primarily because I wanted something small for a little GUI script. Now I think it's just superfluous.
Greetings!
Paul
-- Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:LPr@pontex.cz Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pontex@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz | IDDS: nrpt3sn | IČO: 40763439 Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Mob.: +420 702 033 396
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6e50a7aa57f5569d881f204f124d96ef.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:58:40 +0100
"Paul Schalck"
@Alan B: I've uploaded MetaPost files of the main version.
MP produced using pstoedit is of little interest; it is not the same as generating a graphic naively using MetaPost. Also, writing good MP code is a simple and fun exercise and displays the intentions behind any design. ;-) Alan
participants (9)
-
Alan Braslau
-
Arthur Reutenauer
-
Floris van Manen
-
Hans Hagen
-
Henning Hraban Ramm
-
luigi scarso
-
Paul Schalck
-
Procházka Lukáš Ing.
-
Taco Hoekwater