Why is there anexpression error here? I would expect that the expression number(-10000101) evaluates to a negative number taking part in the comparsion. It looks as if the minus sign is not seen as an unary minus, while -10000101 should have be evaluated by Lua's tonumber(-10000101). relevant code snippet is: \xmlfilter{#1}{lpath[number(@date) <= number(-10000101)]/command(...) xml > lpath > error in expression: number(@date) <= number(-10000101) => expr.number((ll.at and ll.at['date'])) <= expr.number(expr.child(ll,'-')10000101) Changing number(-10000101) to -10000101 does not make a difference. The @date attribute has no problem with a negative value. Hans van der Meer
On 04/28/2016 05:06 PM, dr. Hans van der Meer wrote:
Why is there anexpression error here? I would expect that the expression number(-10000101) evaluates to a negative number taking part in the comparsion. It looks as if the minus sign is not seen as an unary minus, while -10000101 should have be evaluated by Lua's tonumber(-10000101).
relevant code snippet is: \xmlfilter{#1}{lpath[number(@date) <= number(-10000101)]/command(...)
Sorry, Hans, I guess my question will be stupid, but why don’t use "tonumber(-10000101)"? I wouldn’t get it, even with a minimal sample, but xml-mkiv.pdf includes the shortcut for this function. Just in case it might even help ;-), Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
On 28 Apr 2016, at 22:13, Pablo Rodriguez
wrote: On 04/28/2016 05:06 PM, dr. Hans van der Meer wrote:
Why is there anexpression error here? I would expect that the expression number(-10000101) evaluates to a negative number taking part in the comparsion. It looks as if the minus sign is not seen as an unary minus, while -10000101 should have be evaluated by Lua's tonumber(-10000101).
relevant code snippet is: \xmlfilter{#1}{lpath[number(@date) <= number(-10000101)]/command(...)
Sorry, Hans, I guess my question will be stupid, but why don’t use "tonumber(-10000101)"?
It is convenient to use positive numbers for dates after the year 0: AD = Anno Domine, and negative numbers for years before: BC = Before Christ. Comparing dates is easy in both eras.
I wouldn’t get it, even with a minimal sample, but xml-mkiv.pdf includes the shortcut for this function.
Just in case it might even help ;-),
Has to wait until tomorrow, because it is already late in the evening. Hans van der Meer
On 28 Apr 2016, at 22:13, Pablo Rodriguez
I think I have the problem nailed down to the fact that in the comparison:
something >= -1234
the parser in question separates the minus in the negative number into a separate child node, apart from the digits; witness the errormessage in the log below.
Changing the number -1234 in the arithmetic expression to number("-1234") (mind the quotes) does give a correctly evaluated expression.
Still, I am baffled by the fact that in arithmetic expressions positive and negative numbers are treated differently in the filtering operation.
Hans van der Meer
On 29 Apr 2016, at 15:04, Meer, Hans van der
On 5/12/2016 1:49 PM, Meer, Hans van der wrote:
I think I have the problem nailed down to the fact that in the comparison: something >= -1234 the parser in question separates the minus in the negative number into a separate child node, apart from the digits; witness the errormessage in the log below. Changing the number -1234 in the arithmetic expression tonumber("-1234") (mind the quotes) does give a correctly evaluated expression.
Still, I am baffled by the fact that in arithmetic expressions positive and negative numbers are treated differently in the filtering operation.
it's more that 'names' are intercepted .. can you test (lxml-lpt.lua) with: local lp_child = Cc("expr.child(ll,'") * R("az","AZ") * R("az","AZ","--","__")^0 * Cc("')") Hans
Hans van der Meer
On 29 Apr 2016, at 15:04, Meer, Hans van der
mailto:H.vanderMeer@uva.nl> wrote: Here is a minimal example showing that even a number as -1 is not correctly handled by the lpath[selection]-code. I really am convinced that not handling negative numbers should qualify as a mistake.
Hans van der Meer
% failure of negative number comparison. \startxmlsetups demo:numberfail \xmlsetsetup{#1}{root|node}{demo:numberfail:*} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregisterdocumentsetup{demo}{demo:numberfail} \startxmlsetups demo:numberfail:root @atta >= 1:\crlf \xmlfilter{#1}{/[number(@atta) >= 1]/command(demo:numberfail:node)} \blank @atta >= -1:\crlf \xmlfilter{#1}{/[number(@atta) >= -1]/command(demo:numberfail:node)} \xmlfilter{#1}{/[number(@atta) >= number(-1)]/command(demo:numberfail:node)} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups demo:numberfail:node node: attribute atta = \xmlatt{#1}{atta}\crlf \stopxmlsetups \startbuffer[numberfail] <root> <node atta="2"/> <node atta="3"/> </root> \stopbuffer \starttext \xmlprocessbuffer{demo}{numberfail}{} the error from \type{\xmlfilter{#1}{/[number(@atta) >= -1]/command(demo:numberfail:node)}}: \starttyping xml > lpath > error in expression: number(@atta) >= -1 => expr.number((ll.at http://ll.at/ and ll.at http://ll.at/['atta']))
= expr.child(ll,'-')1 \stoptyping
the error from \type{\xmlfilter{#1}{/[number(@atta) >= number(-1)]/command(demo:numberfail:node)}}: \starttyping xml > lpath > error in expression: number(@atta) >= number(-1) => expr.number((ll.at http://ll.at/ and ll.at http://ll.at/['atta']))
= expr.number(expr.child(ll,'-')1) \stoptyping \stoptext
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
dr. Hans van der Meer
-
Hans Hagen
-
Meer, Hans van der
-
Pablo Rodriguez