Hi all, I have just uploaded the archives for luatex 0.20.1. This is a bugfix release for wednesday's beta, and it fixes the following issues: * texlua was broken on Solaris because the some C header files were loaded in the wrong order. * os.tmpdir() now accepts an argument, making it easier to use. It now generates more unique filenames when it is called repeatedly in one run. * The --luaconly commandline switch is now documented in the --help text. * The new extended hyphenation exceptions were severely broken. * \pdfprotrudechars could cause luatex to abort with an assertion failure. * There was a bug in the \span code that could cause endless loops. * The simple forms of \leaders were messed up on windows because a variable was not properly initialized. * Non-grouped \textdir commands created invalid output. * e-TeX's pseudo files were not closed properly in ini mode. * The luatex.web now weaves properly again. * I made some small improvements to the manual. I have uploaded source and linux/win32 binaries to http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex/ Have fun, Taco _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list dev-luatex@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
Hi Taco, on my system (Mac OS X 10.5.1, ppc), this snapshot doesn't compile; it fails at this stage: test -d luatexdir || mkdir luatexdir sed s/TEX-OR-MF-OR-MP/luatex/ ../../../src/texk/web2c/lib/texmfmp.c
luatexextra.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/texk/web2c -I.. -I../../../src/ texk/web2c/.. -I../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../libs/obsdcompat/.. - I../../../src/texk/web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../../src/texk/ web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -Dextra_version_info=`date +-%Y%m%d%H` -g -O2 -c luatexextra.c -o luatexextra.o luatexextra.c: In function 'main': luatexextra.c:408: error: storage size of 'sigstk' isn't known make: *** [luatexextra.o] Error 1
Any ideas? Thomas On Dec 7, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi all,
I have just uploaded the archives for luatex 0.20.1. This is a bugfix release for wednesday's beta, and it fixes the following issues:
* texlua was broken on Solaris because the some C header files were loaded in the wrong order. * os.tmpdir() now accepts an argument, making it easier to use. It now generates more unique filenames when it is called repeatedly in one run. * The --luaconly commandline switch is now documented in the --help text. * The new extended hyphenation exceptions were severely broken. * \pdfprotrudechars could cause luatex to abort with an assertion failure. * There was a bug in the \span code that could cause endless loops. * The simple forms of \leaders were messed up on windows because a variable was not properly initialized. * Non-grouped \textdir commands created invalid output. * e-TeX's pseudo files were not closed properly in ini mode. * The luatex.web now weaves properly again. * I made some small improvements to the manual.
I have uploaded source and linux/win32 binaries to
http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/luatex/
Have fun,
Taco
_______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list dev-luatex@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi Taco,
on my system (Mac OS X 10.5.1, ppc), this snapshot doesn't compile; it fails at this stage:
test -d luatexdir || mkdir luatexdir sed s/TEX-OR-MF-OR-MP/luatex/ ../../../src/texk/web2c/lib/texmfmp.c
luatexextra.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/texk/web2c -I.. -I../../../src/ texk/web2c/.. -I../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../libs/obsdcompat/.. - I../../../src/texk/web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat -I../../../src/texk/ web2c/../../libs/obsdcompat/.. -Dextra_version_info=`date +-%Y%m%d%H` -g -O2 -c luatexextra.c -o luatexextra.o luatexextra.c: In function 'main': luatexextra.c:408: error: storage size of 'sigstk' isn't known make: *** [luatexextra.o] Error 1
Any ideas?
That's odd, I believe the 'sigaltstack' code came from Jonathan Kew,
who is definately on a Mac himself. What was the previous beta you
compiled yourself, do you remember? Otherwise, maybe Arthur knows.
(The "struct sigaltstack" is supposed to be defined in the
What was the previous beta you compiled yourself, do you remember? Otherwise, maybe Arthur knows.
I cross-compiled LuaTeX beta-0.20.0 for PPC Tiger yesterday (on my Intel Mac Tiger). No noticeable problems. It's on the foundry.
(The "struct sigaltstack" is supposed to be defined in the
header.)
That's weird, it's a function there. But it has not caused any problems until now! Arthur
On Fr, 07 Dez 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I have just uploaded the archives for luatex 0.20.1. This
Debian sid users will get 0.20.1 soon by normal update.
Debian etch users can add
deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/
This release of luatex for Debian ships an improved texdoc written in
texlua by Frank Küster. Please report any strange things to
debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Thanks Taco!
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 07 Dez 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I have just uploaded the archives for luatex 0.20.1. This
Debian sid users will get 0.20.1 soon by normal update. Debian etch users can add deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/
This release of luatex for Debian ships an improved texdoc written in texlua by Frank Küster. Please report any strange things to debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Excuse my ignorance, but is it safe to use these sources for ubuntu gusty as well? Aditya
On Mo, 10 Dez 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/
This release of luatex for Debian ships an improved texdoc written in texlua by Frank Küster. Please report any strange things to debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Excuse my ignorance, but is it safe to use these sources for ubuntu gusty as well?
Safe for sure, but you have to check whether it compiles. It depends on
the version of libpoppler present in Ubuntu Gutsy.
For libpoppler 0.4.X (X <= 8) take the etch variant
For libpoppler 0.4.9 or 0.5.X you have to unpack the source package,
change the debian/patches/series file to list the
libpoppler-0.5 patch and comment the libpoppler-0.4 and -0.6
For libpoppler 0.6.X take the sid variant (available at the same
location as the etch variant but with terminal
luatex-sid
instead of luatex)
Sorry for being of not so much help, but I don't have a gutsy around and
I never could find out which versions of Ubuntu ship which versions of
libraries.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mo, 10 Dez 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/
This release of luatex for Debian ships an improved texdoc written in texlua by Frank Küster. Please report any strange things to debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
Excuse my ignorance, but is it safe to use these sources for ubuntu gusty as well?
Safe for sure, but you have to check whether it compiles. It depends on the version of libpoppler present in Ubuntu Gutsy.
For libpoppler 0.4.X (X <= 8) take the etch variant For libpoppler 0.4.9 or 0.5.X you have to unpack the source package, change the debian/patches/series file to list the libpoppler-0.5 patch and comment the libpoppler-0.4 and -0.6 For libpoppler 0.6.X take the sid variant (available at the same location as the etch variant but with terminal luatex-sid instead of luatex)
Sorry for being of not so much help, but I don't have a gutsy around and I never could find out which versions of Ubuntu ship which versions of libraries.
Ubuntu gusty ships with libpoppler 0.6.2.1. However, I do not get any suggested updates because I am using amd64 architecture, and I see that you do not have amd64 packages on your website. I will wait for the new packages to trickle through to ubuntu repositories. Aditya
Hi Aditya, On Mo, 10 Dez 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Ubuntu gusty ships with libpoppler 0.6.2.1. However, I do not get any suggested updates because I am using amd64 architecture, and I see that
Ok, for you
deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex-sid/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex-sid/
I will upload amd64 as soon as I can build them. In the meantime you can
do:
- add the above to /etc/apt/sources
- aptitude update
- apt-get source luatex
- cd luatex-0.20.1
- dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b
- cd ..
- dpkg -i luatex*.deb
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Aditya,
On Mo, 10 Dez 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Ubuntu gusty ships with libpoppler 0.6.2.1. However, I do not get any suggested updates because I am using amd64 architecture, and I see that
Ok, for you deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex-sid/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex-sid/
I will upload amd64 as soon as I can build them. In the meantime you can do:
- add the above to /etc/apt/sources - aptitude update - apt-get source luatex - cd luatex-0.20.1 - dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -b - cd .. - dpkg -i luatex*.deb
Thank you. I needed to install a few packages (libpoppler-dev, quilt, fakeroot), and after that everything compiled correctly. What is required for building a .deb file for amd64 for distribution. Can the luatex_0.20.1-1_amd64.deb that I built by the above process be used on other amd64 machines? If so, then maybe I can upload the file somewhere. Aditya
On Di, 11 Dez 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thank you. I needed to install a few packages (libpoppler-dev, quilt, fakeroot), and after that everything compiled correctly.
Not surprising ;-)
What is required for building a .deb file for amd64 for distribution. Can the luatex_0.20.1-1_amd64.deb that I built by the above process be used on
Yes. You can send it to other Hardy users, or put it up somewhere. I
will build an amd64 version for Debian/sid
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining
participants (5)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Arthur Reutenauer -
Norbert Preining -
Taco Hoekwater -
Thomas A. Schmitz