![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/23c65792d6f3eb5f6194f6ec9eadc2ac.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
De: Jairo A. del Rio
On 5/11/2024 8:33 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
As for the current ConTeXt, the example above still produces the wrong output. Can anyone reproduce this case? Thank you in advance. It's a bit tricky but this is what i can get ... see attached.
(You have to wait till a next upload.)
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ed6f43113e3f1cee031ebd13654fc703.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 5/13/2024 11:54 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
---------- Forwarded message --------- De: *Jairo A. del Rio*
mailto:jairoadelrio6@gmail.com> Date: lun, 13 may 2024 a la(s) 9:53 p.m. Subject: Re: outlinetext broken? To: Hans Hagen mailto:j.hagen@xs4all.nl> Hi, Hans! Thank you for the update! I'm curious about the following issue: when I use Latin Modern (by default), a thick, filled line is drawn next to the radical. However, when I use another font such as TeX Gyre Schola, I get something similar to outlines-003.pdf, which is, in turn, similar to the result of applying PDF effects. So, shouldn't this result be the default? Thanks a lot again.
it depends on how a radical is composed; we try create an extensible using snippets which looks better in the case of fontd where rules (have to) have roun dcorners etc Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Hans Hagen
-
Jairo A. del Rio