I'm using a TTF file that has no ligature capability as a built-in feature. It does however have glyphs for fi and fl but ConTeXt isn't substituting them. So the question is: what do I need to do to persuade ConTeXt to do fi & fl ligature substitution? — Bruce Horrocks Hampshire, UK
On 21 Sep 2021, at 02:47, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
I'm using a TTF file that has no ligature capability as a built-in feature. It does however have glyphs for fi and fl but ConTeXt isn't substituting them.
So the question is: what do I need to do to persuade ConTeXt to do fi & fl ligature substitution?
Any suggestions please? Is a font features file the 'right' way? I would have thought that there was a more traditional solution — Bruce Horrocks Hampshire, UK
On 10/2/2021 12:35 AM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
On 21 Sep 2021, at 02:47, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
wrote: I'm using a TTF file that has no ligature capability as a built-in feature. It does however have glyphs for fi and fl but ConTeXt isn't substituting them.
So the question is: what do I need to do to persuade ConTeXt to do fi & fl ligature substitution?
Any suggestions please? Is a font features file the 'right' way? I would have thought that there was a more traditional solution you can write your own feature (examplex in test suite and manuals) where you map f + f onto ff
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 2 Oct 2021, at 00:46, Hans Hagen
On 10/2/2021 12:35 AM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
On 21 Sep 2021, at 02:47, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
wrote: I'm using a TTF file that has no ligature capability as a built-in feature. It does however have glyphs for fi and fl but ConTeXt isn't substituting them.
So the question is: what do I need to do to persuade ConTeXt to do fi & fl ligature substitution?
Any suggestions please? Is a font features file the 'right' way? I would have thought that there was a more traditional solution you can write your own feature (examplex in test suite and manuals) where you map f + f onto ff
Thanks Hans - I keep forgetting about the test suite. For the benefit of those coming here via the mail archive, I found what I needed in the cont-tst.zip test suite in the file fonts/extensions-001.tex http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/latest/cont-tst.zip Now my problem is that the font only has ligatures for fi and fl which is making my life di-ffi-cult. <groan> — Bruce Horrocks Hampshire, UK
On 10/3/2021 1:34 AM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
On 2 Oct 2021, at 00:46, Hans Hagen
wrote: On 10/2/2021 12:35 AM, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context wrote:
On 21 Sep 2021, at 02:47, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
wrote: I'm using a TTF file that has no ligature capability as a built-in feature. It does however have glyphs for fi and fl but ConTeXt isn't substituting them.
So the question is: what do I need to do to persuade ConTeXt to do fi & fl ligature substitution?
Any suggestions please? Is a font features file the 'right' way? I would have thought that there was a more traditional solution you can write your own feature (examplex in test suite and manuals) where you map f + f onto ff
Thanks Hans - I keep forgetting about the test suite.
For the benefit of those coming here via the mail archive, I found what I needed in the cont-tst.zip test suite in the file fonts/extensions-001.tex http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/latest/cont-tst.zip
Now my problem is that the font only has ligatures for fi and fl which is making my life di-ffi-cult. <groan> Then forget abnout the ligatures ... these two were probably only added because of 'habbit'. Most people won't notice.
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Bruce Horrocks
-
Hans Hagen