![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5aa6984b53b8925e405ebbdbc051ad9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
If you have many marginals, they tend to conflict. The option stack=yes should enhance the situation. I don’t expect wonders – if there’s not enough space, then ConTeXt can’t solve it. But it used to work better, as I can see in my magazines from the last years. Now I can’t see a difference between stack=yes or no: \usemodule[visual] \useMPlibrary[dum] \setupmargindata[inmargin][stack=yes] \starttext \dorecurse{20}{% \fakewords{5}{30} \inmargin{\externalfigure[dummy\recurselevel][width=15mm,height=15mm]} \fakewords{5}{40}\par } \stoptext Hraban
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5955e8e90611e77ccbfc7721b6112027.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 5/31/22 19:09, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
If you have many marginals, they tend to conflict.
The option stack=yes should enhance the situation.
I don’t expect wonders – if there’s not enough space, then ConTeXt can’t solve it. But it used to work better, as I can see in my magazines from the last years.
Now I can’t see a difference between stack=yes or no:
Hi Hraban, I can confirm that, diffpdf (open source version shipped with Fedora) shows no difference (they appear to be the same). Just in case it might help, Pablo
participants (2)
-
Henning Hraban Ramm
-
Pablo Rodriguez