Hi. Is there analog of \hdotsfor command in context (mkiv)? The description of \hdotsfor command is in amsldoc.pdf[1] on page 11. [1] http://mirror.ctan.org/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/amsldoc.pdf --- WBR, Vladimir Lomov -- If I could drop dead right now, I'd be the happiest man alive! -Samuel Goldwyn
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Hi.
Is there analog of \hdotsfor command in context (mkiv)?
The description of \hdotsfor command is in amsldoc.pdf[1] on page 11.
[1] http://mirror.ctan.org/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/amsldoc.pdf
I don't think there is an equivalent context macro. But hdotsfor should just be a combination of \span\omit + \hdotfill. So, just copying the definition from amsmath.sty should work. We need to think of a good syntax for matrices in ConTeXt to handle such things. Aditya
Hi.
2010/11/24 Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Hi.
Is there analog of \hdotsfor command in context (mkiv)?
The description of \hdotsfor command is in amsldoc.pdf[1] on page 11.
[1] http://mirror.ctan.org/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/amsldoc.pdf
I don't think there is an equivalent context macro. But hdotsfor should just be a combination of \span\omit + \hdotfill. The command \hdotfill is not defined (in TeX Live 2010 context with updates from tlcontrib.metatex.org and in context minimal).
So, just copying the definition from amsmath.sty should work. I looked into this definition and think that it uses some LaTeX commands. I could convert it to context but I'd like to have test files, so not right now. We need to think of a good syntax for matrices in ConTeXt to handle such things. Command \start/stopmatrix is good enough, but you mean matrix as visual representation.
--- WBR, Vladimir Lomov
participants (2)
-
Aditya Mahajan -
Vladimir Lomov