Hi, as the footnotes mechanism was rewritten, there are several things that don't work anymore (as expected). I collected some of them in my minimal below: The lines with "<- OK!" do work, those marked with "<- ???" don't. Could someone please help me with the new syntax context expects now? Thanks, Steffen ------- % concering subfootnote \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][] \definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers] % <- ??? \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote] % footnote's rule \unexpanded\def\MyRule{\startcolor[orange]\vrule width18mm height0.4pt\vskip2mm\stopcolor} % footnote's interlineskip etc. \startsetups footnotesetup \setupinterlinespace[line=9.8pt, height=.79,depth=.21] \lineskiplimit-\maxdimen \setupwhitespace[2pt] \stopsetups % footnotes bottom page \def\newFNnumber#1{\kern0.05em\raise.385em\hbox{\switchtobodyfont[16pt]#1}}% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? \def\MyNote#1{\kern0.05em\raise.385em\hbox{\switchtobodyfont[8pt]#1}}% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? %% \setupnote[footnote][before=\vskip3.0mm,textcolor=red,rule=\MyRule]% distance lowest line of main text to ruler <- ??? \setupnote[footnote][bottom=\strut\vskip5pt]% flushbottom adjustment <- OK! %% \setupnote[footnote] [split=strict, symbolcommand=\gobbleoneargument,% switch for triangle textcommand=\MyNote,% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? numbercommand=\newFNnumber,% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? setups=footnotesetup, align={block,hanging},% <- OK! bodyfont={rm,9pt}]% <- OK! %%-----------------------------------------------------------------------% \def\newFNcommand#1{\hskip10pt#1\enskip\strut}% \setupnotation[before={\hfuzz0pt\setupinteraction[color=red,contrastcolor=darkgray]},after={\setupinteraction[color=black]},command=\newFNcommand,indentnext=yes,indenting={10pt,yes},location=serried]% <- ??? \starttext \dorecurse{3}{test\footnote{\input ward \par} text % \dorecurse{3}{test\subfootnote{\input ward \par} text } } \stoptext
Am I the only one who uses footnotes ? ;o) Steffen Am 21.02.2012 um 11:11 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
as the footnotes mechanism was rewritten, there are several things that don't work anymore (as expected).
I collected some of them in my minimal below: The lines with "<- OK!" do work, those marked with "<- ???" don't.
Could someone please help me with the new syntax context expects now?
Thanks, Steffen -------
% concering subfootnote \definestructureseparatorset [footnote][][] \definestructureconversionset[footnote][numbers,characters][numbers] % <- ??? \setupenumerations[footnote][numberconversionset=footnote,numberseparatorset=footnote]
% footnote's rule \unexpanded\def\MyRule{\startcolor[orange]\vrule width18mm height0.4pt\vskip2mm\stopcolor}
% footnote's interlineskip etc. \startsetups footnotesetup \setupinterlinespace[line=9.8pt, height=.79,depth=.21] \lineskiplimit-\maxdimen \setupwhitespace[2pt] \stopsetups
% footnotes bottom page \def\newFNnumber#1{\kern0.05em\raise.385em\hbox{\switchtobodyfont[16pt]#1}}% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? \def\MyNote#1{\kern0.05em\raise.385em\hbox{\switchtobodyfont[8pt]#1}}% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? %% \setupnote[footnote][before=\vskip3.0mm,textcolor=red,rule=\MyRule]% distance lowest line of main text to ruler <- ??? \setupnote[footnote][bottom=\strut\vskip5pt]% flushbottom adjustment <- OK! %% \setupnote[footnote] [split=strict, symbolcommand=\gobbleoneargument,% switch for triangle textcommand=\MyNote,% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? numbercommand=\newFNnumber,% size of number in front of FN-text <- ??? setups=footnotesetup, align={block,hanging},% <- OK! bodyfont={rm,9pt}]% <- OK! %%-----------------------------------------------------------------------% \def\newFNcommand#1{\hskip10pt#1\enskip\strut}% \setupnotation[before={\hfuzz0pt\setupinteraction[color=red,contrastcolor=darkgray]},after={\setupinteraction[color=black]},command=\newFNcommand,indentnext=yes,indenting={10pt,yes},location=serried]% <- ???
\starttext
\dorecurse{3}{test\footnote{\input ward \par} text % \dorecurse{3}{test\subfootnote{\input ward \par} text } }
\stoptext ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
On 02/21/2012 09:24 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am I the only one who uses footnotes ?
;o)
Steffen
No, I'm using footnotes too, and the current implementation is an absolute disaster. I get weird and unexpected behavior as well. 1. Footnotes are shifted to the following page. This puts a huge black triangle at the position of the footnote marker. I have no idea how to get rid of it, and I have no idea why this is the default behavior - nobody wants that in printed documents, I suppose? 2. Footnote numbers in the footnotes themselves are shifted one line down. Luckily, I still have 2011.11.29 around, which doesn't have these problems. Hans had warned about the current beta a few days ago; I hope things will calm down in the not-too-distant future... Thomas
Am 22.02.2012 um 11:44 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On 02/21/2012 09:24 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am I the only one who uses footnotes ?
;o)
Steffen
No, I'm using footnotes too, and the current implementation is an absolute disaster. I get weird and unexpected behavior as well.
1. Footnotes are shifted to the following page. This puts a huge black triangle at the position of the footnote marker. I have no idea how to get rid of it, and I have no idea why this is the default behavior - nobody wants that in printed documents, I suppose?
2. Footnote numbers in the footnotes themselves are shifted one line down.
Luckily, I still have 2011.11.29 around, which doesn't have these problems. Hans had warned about the current beta a few days ago; I hope things will calm down in the not-too-distant future...
Unfortunately up to vers. 20120125 there is a bug when cite/index/startregister and bookmarks are used in a project. The first version that solved this bug was vers. 20120208 ... and this already introduced the new footnotes. The triangle can be switched of by "\setupnote[symbolcommand=\gobbleoneargument]", as Wolfgang knew. In general we'd need a comprehensive explanation what is new and what has to be changed. Steffen
participants (2)
-
Steffen Wolfrum -
Thomas A. Schmitz