Re: [NTG-context] ntg-context Digest, Vol 51, Issue 36
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you show us what do you get from my two examples.
I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work. In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows the 'eszet' while the second example (test4.pdf) doesn't. Jürgen
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you show us what do you get from my two examples.
I'm going to try to and I hope the attachments will work. In short: the first example (result in test3.pdf) shows the 'eszet' while the second example (test4.pdf) doesn't.
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4? Wolfgang
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4?
I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning.
test3: umlaut-utf.tex test4: umlaut-latin.tex
Can you try this \enableregime[windows] \starttext \SS\space\ssharp\space\number`ß \stoptext Wolfgang
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Goebel, Juergen wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Which file do you used for test3 and which for test4?
I'm sorry, seems to be too early in the morning.
test3: umlaut-utf.tex test4: umlaut-latin.tex
Can you try this
\enableregime[windows] \starttext \SS\space\ssharp\space\number`ß \stoptext
[windows] is a bad nomenclature. Either [windows-1252] or [cp1252]. But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK? From the original post: \setupencoding is not supposed to be used this way: \setupencoding[texnansi] maybe \setupencoding[default=texnansi] but that won't have any effect on default font that is loaded. Mojca (Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt - *many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and regimes, so before starting complaining that something doesn't work, try upgrading first. And I really mean it.)
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK?
No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt - *many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and regimes, so before starting complaining that something doesn't work, try upgrading first. And I really mean it.)
ACK. Regards, Jürgen
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK?
No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt - *many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and regimes, so before starting complaining that something doesn't work, try upgrading first. And I really mean it.)
ACK.
Can you try it again with my new test files. Wolfgang
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Goebel, Juergen
wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote:
But as far as I understood, the problem got resolved, right? Didn't the umlaut-utf work OK? No, not with my oldtimer.
(Jürgen, in case that you are still using the old version of ConTeXt - *many* aspects have improved since then, including encodings and regimes, so before starting complaining that something doesn't work, try upgrading first. And I really mean it.) ACK.
Can you try it again with my new test files.
to whoever started this tread ... next time don't use "Digest..." as subject since it does not reflect the thread's topic Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try it again with my new test files.
umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex --> no sharp s umlaut-utf-8.tex --> sharp s umlaut-windows-1250.tex --> no sharp s BTW: The download is running (or should I say crawling) with a gargantuan data rate of about 25 kbit/s ... Juergen
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Goebel, Juergen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try it again with my new test files.
umlaut-iso-8859-1.tex --> no sharp s umlaut-utf-8.tex --> sharp s umlaut-windows-1250.tex --> no sharp s
Can you try my updated version of the two buggy files, I think I found the problem and want to be sure. Wolfgang
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can you try my updated version of the two buggy files, I think I found the problem and want to be sure.
Both versions still show no sharp s, but it's the oldtimer running. The download of the new version will soon be finished and tomorrow I'll install it - hopefully successfull! Juergen
participants (4)
-
Goebel, Juergen
-
Hans Hagen
-
Mojca Miklavec
-
Wolfgang Schuster