On 18 Aug 2014, at 16:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Your problem is the line above where you use “einrueckung” as keyword for \setupindenting which is invalid and causes the error message. Aha. Strange. When I use the stand alone version, this is no problem. And if I comment out the lines with »einrueckung« (it’s no illegal, I defined it), I get the message, that \defineconversionset is illegal. But there is no problem if I use the stand alone version. Hmm...

Well: I use MKIV. On 18 Aug 2014, at 17:05, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote:

...

I don’t know if I use MKII or not.

(Simplified version). If you compile the file using `context filename` you are using MkIV; if you compile the file using `texexec filename` you are using MkII.

Unless you have a really good reason to stick to MkII (legacy code, etc), use MkIV.

Aditya___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

On 18 Aug 2014, at 18:17, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

MkIV will not load .mkii files. What is the exact command that you use to run context?

Aha! You found the point! I use Texnicle as editor and the context engine Texnicle provides. It calls texexec... But it’s not enough to put here context. The problem remains, that I get the message, that fancy break is undefined. OK. That’s enough. I stay with the stand alone version. I don’t know why, but it works. (It was just the point that I have two times context on my hard disk. I could delete LaTeX, but I fell the moment apporaching when I turn back to LaTeX. It’s a pity... Context is by far the better system – in all points but one: If one don’t know how to use it, one will never know...) Anyway: Thanks for the help. W.

I made a new step: I found out how to change the script in Texnicle. It was for MKII, now I changed it to MKIV. It works well now. The problem is just the module fancybreak. When I try to use it, I get the message »Undefined control sequence«. Some lines before I find: »resolvers > modules > 'fancybreak' is already loaded«. This doesn’t happen with the stand alone. What is wrong here? On 18 Aug 2014, at 19:40, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Am 18.08.2014 um 19:03 schrieb Werner Hintze :

...

On 18 Aug 2014, at 18:17, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...

MkIV will not load .mkii files. What is the exact command that you use to run context?

Aha! You found the point! I use Texnicle as editor and the context engine Texnicle provides. It calls texexec... But it’s not enough to put here context. The problem remains, that I get the message, that fancy break is undefined.

What happens when you process this example with Texnicle:

\usemodule[fancybreak]

\starttext

\input knuth

\fancybreak{$***$}

\input ward

\stoptext

Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________