![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3b89ade8854fe10b5e3f8c87c6fa82f5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
When using texexec I used the parameter --timeout. With context this parameter does not generate an error, but it does not have the expected result. Does context not have this parameter? -- Cecil Westerhof
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 14-3-2011 12:40, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When using texexec I used the parameter --timeout. With context this parameter does not generate an error, but it does not have the expected result. Does context not have this parameter?
no ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Cecil Westerhof
When using texexec I used the parameter --timeout. With context this parameter does not generate an error, but it does not have the expected result. Does context not have this parameter?
-- Cecil Westerhof if you are using bash see at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/687948/timeout-a-command-in-bash-without-...
-- luigi
participants (3)
-
Cecil Westerhof
-
Hans Hagen
-
luigi scarso