Hi I'm typesetting a document using the context bib/bibltx modules and the 'ams' style. In the printed bibliography, entries with many authors are converted into: "Hansen et al." as they should, but printed as: "Hansenet al." which looks bad. My output looks much better using the following very simple tweak of the file 'bibl-ams.tex' 99c99 < \c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it et al.\/}}] ---
\c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it\ et al.\/}}]
Just wanted to post is in case someone finds this handy. -Peter
Peter I. Hansen wrote:
Hi
I'm typesetting a document using the context bib/bibltx modules and the 'ams' style. In the printed bibliography, entries with many authors are converted into: "Hansen et al." as they should, but printed as: "Hansenet al." which looks bad.
My output looks much better using the following very simple tweak of the file 'bibl-ams.tex'
99c99 < \c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it et al.\/}}] ---
\c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it\ et al.\/}}]
Just wanted to post is in case someone finds this handy.
I thought I had fixed that (semi!)recently, IIRC the problem was not in the bibl- file but a missing \relax in the core module. Is http://modules.contextgarden.net/bib still wrong? Best wishes, Taco
On Dec 4, 2007 10:01 AM, Taco Hoekwater
Peter I. Hansen wrote:
Hi
I'm typesetting a document using the context bib/bibltx modules and the 'ams' style. In the printed bibliography, entries with many authors are converted into: "Hansen et al." as they should, but printed as: "Hansenet al." which looks bad.
My output looks much better using the following very simple tweak of the file 'bibl-ams.tex'
99c99 < \c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it et al.\/}}] ---
\c!artauthoretaltext={ {\it\ et al.\/}}]
Just wanted to post is in case someone finds this handy.
I thought I had fixed that (semi!)recently, IIRC the problem was not in the bibl- file but a missing \relax in the core module. Is
http://modules.contextgarden.net/bib
still wrong?
I just know that it didn't work the way I wanted. I use the version provided by debian Sid (http://packages.debian.org/sid/texlive-base) which seems to be numbered 2007-13. -Peter
Peter I. Hansen wrote:
I just know that it didn't work the way I wanted. I use the version provided by debian Sid (http://packages.debian.org/sid/texlive-base) which seems to be numbered 2007-13.
I have no idea of what that number relates to at my end. If you look up t-bib.tex on your harddisk, it should have a version= statement on the third line. Best wishes, Taco
participants (2)
-
Peter I. Hansen
-
Taco Hoekwater