![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/93131e1e6e2204bd13501390d768dbdc.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Hans, font expansion is broken in MkIV. \definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Wolfgang
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 25-12-2009 17:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
font expansion is broken in MkIV.
\definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext
can you check the beta (ftp/website)? \definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-12-2009 17:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
font expansion is broken in MkIV.
\definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext
can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
works for me! Best wishes, Taco
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ? -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ad5afbb91c8b5ec2b1199838461a8348.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) 2 is rather extreme. and print looks better than screen, it may be the renderer... Regards, Hartmut
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Hartmut Henkel
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) my png from xpdf shows an horrible page (also acroread and mupdf show the same). What are the values for a normal apparence ? -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ad5afbb91c8b5ec2b1199838461a8348.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) my png from xpdf shows an horrible page (also acroread and mupdf show the same). What are the values for a normal apparence ?
here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font. extend=0.3 (or maybe 0.2) is good for legalese. Regards, Hartmut
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2 # context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419 Should I try luatex from svn ? -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ad5afbb91c8b5ec2b1199838461a8348.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp. Regards, Hartmut
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 26-12-2009 15:27, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp.
indeed, a the garden only syncs once per hour Hans
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Hans Hagen
On 26-12-2009 15:27, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp.
indeed, a the garden only syncs once per hour
fixed with last beta -- luigi
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0d7c303452b11b8403ba1754990d559c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer. Greetings Andreas
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7325514c8a7b377b86d86ad29d35e8ef.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
Could you please start a new thread when you want to ask a question, replying to an existing thread, though you changed the subject, makes following threads harder. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0d7c303452b11b8403ba1754990d559c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 26.12.2009 um 15:39 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
Could you please start a new thread when you want to ask a question, replying to an existing thread, though you changed the subject, makes following threads harder.
Yes sure, it wasn’t deliberate. Andreas
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/49e63acb01f2ca80efce7eed08310ce8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 26-12-2009 15:33, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
i will look into it nbut not today ... btw, a better test is \startbuffer effe betroffenen betroffenen \stopbuffer must be some side effect ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (7)
-
Andreas Harder
-
Hans Hagen
-
Hartmut Henkel
-
Khaled Hosny
-
luigi scarso
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Wolfgang Schuster