Hi Hans, font expansion is broken in MkIV. \definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Wolfgang
On 25-12-2009 17:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
font expansion is broken in MkIV.
\definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext
can you check the beta (ftp/website)? \definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-12-2009 17:31, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
font expansion is broken in MkIV.
\definefontfeature[default][default][expansion=quality] %\setupalign[hz] \usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern] \starttext \input knuth \stoptext
can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
works for me! Best wishes, Taco
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ? -- luigi
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) 2 is rather extreme. and print looks better than screen, it may be the renderer... Regards, Hartmut
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Hartmut Henkel
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) my png from xpdf shows an horrible page (also acroread and mupdf show the same). What are the values for a normal apparence ? -- luigi
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote: can you check the beta (ftp/website)?
\definefontfeature[default][default] [expansion=quality,extend=2,slant=.2]
\usetypescript[modern] \setupbodyfont[modern]
\starttext \input knuth \stoptext
It looks a bit strange -- is it ok ?
if it looks as it looks here, it looks strange, but it is ok. :-) my png from xpdf shows an horrible page (also acroread and mupdf show the same). What are the values for a normal apparence ?
here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font. extend=0.3 (or maybe 0.2) is good for legalese. Regards, Hartmut
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2 # context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419 Should I try luatex from svn ? -- luigi
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp. Regards, Hartmut
On 26-12-2009 15:27, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp.
indeed, a the garden only syncs once per hour Hans
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Hans Hagen
On 26-12-2009 15:27, Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Hartmut Henkel
wrote: here it looks as attached, maybe you still have the unpatched one? extend=1, slant=0 would be the normal font.
not here, with test-wolf-e1s0.pdf : extended=1, slanted=0 test-wolf-e2s0.2.pdf extended=2, slanted=0.2
# context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/luatex/minimals-beta/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.24 17:55 # luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122419
Should I try luatex from svn ?
you need today's cont-tmf.zip from pragma ftp.
indeed, a the garden only syncs once per hour
fixed with last beta -- luigi
Hi, can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer. Greetings Andreas
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
Could you please start a new thread when you want to ask a question, replying to an existing thread, though you changed the subject, makes following threads harder. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
Am 26.12.2009 um 15:39 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 03:33:30PM +0100, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
Could you please start a new thread when you want to ask a question, replying to an existing thread, though you changed the subject, makes following threads harder.
Yes sure, it wasn’t deliberate. Andreas
On 26-12-2009 15:33, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
can someone confirm the misbehaviour with ligatures in my example? It’s there since the last three or four betas, perhaps longer.
i will look into it nbut not today ... btw, a better test is \startbuffer effe betroffenen betroffenen \stopbuffer must be some side effect ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (7)
-
Andreas Harder
-
Hans Hagen
-
Hartmut Henkel
-
Khaled Hosny
-
luigi scarso
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Wolfgang Schuster