![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0e94fb08d4620cfbd2f8f59a7868637.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi minimalists, is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version 0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this seems the latest version on supelec as well. All best Thomas
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi minimalists,
is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version 0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this seems the latest version on supelec as well.
Yes, it is because 0.29.0 is somewhat broken (0.30.0 tomorrow). Best wishes, Taco
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6114858d84b0f40cf715f12237ab67a1.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi minimalists,
is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version 0.28.0-2008071500?
There must have been some mistake made by accident and the version was tagged as being 0.29, so it never got updated/recompiled. I wanted to recompile the binaries right away, but svn up on the server just returned me svn: In directory 'bin/tex/linux-64/current/pdftex/bin' svn: Can't copy 'bin/tex/linux-64/current/pdftex/bin/.svn/tmp/text-base/pdftex.svn-base' to 'bin/tex/linux-64/current/pdftex/bin/.svn/tmp/pdftex.tmp.tmp': No space left on device and then I stopped experimenting for a while. I need to try to clean up some stuff first. Mojca
participants (3)
-
Mojca Miklavec
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Thomas A. Schmitz