On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

Hi,

I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

Thanks for the new beta, Hans.

For me first-setup.sh still downloads the 2013.06.10. Aditya

On 13/07/13 03:57, Otared Kavian wrote:

On 12 juil. 2013, at 20:06, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

...

On 12/07/13 19:21, Hans Hagen wrote:

...

Hi,

I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

Thanks for the new beta, Hans.

For me first-setup.sh still downloads the 2013.06.10.

This is also my case: has something changed in first-setup.sh?

I didn’t check that after downloading the new beta from yesterday. first-setup.sh has just downloaded ConTeXt - 2013.06.10 22:51. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

On 7/14/2013 10:37 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote:

·········

...

Hi,

I uploaded a beta. There are not that many changes. Currently I develop in a separate branch but it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

There a copy’n’paste mistake in luatex-basics-nod.lua. See attached diff.

that's one of the things i'm working on ... just don't update your latex derived files for a while; i'm going to add some experimental that will work ok, but might need more time for generic to work too (lower priority) ... after all, it's beta and not meant to be used in stable tl 2013 Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 14/07/13 10:53, Philipp Gesang wrote:

·········

...

it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

[...] Failing example with ligatures:

\font\foo="file:Iwona-Regular.otf:mode=node;+liga" \foo ffi \bye

Hi Philipp, ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10. But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2: \starttext \input knuth \stoptext Am I the only one hit by this? Thanks, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

Hi all,

ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10.

But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2:

\starttext \input knuth \stoptext

Am I the only one hit by this?

I can confirm this, too. Anyone already tracked that down and has a working fix? Thanks, Steffen

Am 17.07.2013 um 12:23 schrieb Hans Hagen :

On 7/16/2013 11:12 AM, Steffen Kram wrote:

...

Hi all,

...

ligature seems to fail also with beta from 2013.06.10.

But with the latest beta, pages start numbering from 2:

\starttext \input knuth \stoptext

Am I the only one hit by this?

I can confirm this, too. Anyone already tracked that down and has a working fix?

i uploaded a beta a few days ago ... so is it still an issue?

It's still the case with the version I downloaded yesterday. An extra-page is added after my title-page. Steffen

·········

·········

...

it might be that some changes are reflected in the betas, and hopefully not breaking anything.

Unhappily, it does. In the generic font loader the new “nuts” table is a synonym for “nodes”, but it would appear that it is also required to contain certain functions from the builtin “node” namespace, e.g. node.copy(), node.tail() and the likes.

Failing example with ligatures:

\font\foo="file:Iwona-Regular.otf:mode=node;+liga" \foo ffi \bye

Thanks for the fix. Have fun “going nuts”, then! Best, Philipp