Small integral signes with Palatino - ntg-context - NTG Mailing Lists

newer
pushing margintext up

Small integral signes with Palatino

older
How to typeset recipe symbol for a...

Tim Steenvoorden

20 May 2012 20 May '12

10:52 a.m.

Dear list, Have some problems with the latest beta. I get small integral signs when using Palatino math (see minimal example in attachment). Any clou? ConTeXt version: 2012.05.18 23:50, Mac OS X 10.6.8 Regards, Tim

Attachments:

integrals_mkii.pdf (application/pdf — 26.2 KB)
integrals_mkiv.pdf (application/pdf — 13.2 KB)
integrals.tex (application/x-tex — 206 bytes)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Tim Steenvoorden

24 May 24 May

8:05 a.m.

Hi all, I'm still struggling with the same issue in 2012.05.24. Anyone? Cheers, Tim 2012/5/20 Tim Steenvoorden :

Dear list,

Have some problems with the latest beta. I get small integral signs when using Palatino math (see minimal example in attachment). Any clou?

ConTeXt version: 2012.05.18 23:50, Mac OS X 10.6.8

Regards, Tim

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

luigi scarso

8:09 a.m.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

Hi all,

I'm still struggling with the same issue in 2012.05.24. Anyone?

Cheers, Tim Yes --- sorry, I can only confirm your issue. -- luigi

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Aditya Mahajan

1:59 p.m.

On Thu, 24 May 2012, luigi scarso wrote:

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

...
Hi all,

I'm still struggling with the same issue in 2012.05.24. Anyone?

Cheers, Tim Yes --- sorry, I can only confirm your issue.

Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)? I think that adding a patch to px-math.cfg to scale DisplayOperatorMinHeight should fix it; but I don't have the time to look into this right now. Aditya

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Tim Steenvoorden

9:40 p.m.

Sorry, can't help with that. The first ConTeXt beta I tested for TeXLive 2012 is 2012.05.14. Before that I used 2011.05.18 from TeXLive 2011. Tim 2012/5/24 Aditya Mahajan :

On Thu, 24 May 2012, luigi scarso wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

...
Hi all,

I'm still struggling with the same issue in 2012.05.24. Anyone?

Cheers, Tim

Yes --- sorry, I can only confirm your issue.

Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)? I think that adding a patch to px-math.cfg to scale DisplayOperatorMinHeight should fix it; but I don't have the time to look into this right now.

Aditya

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Mojca Miklavec

10:05 p.m.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09 (https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/58e91401c966ea58ff13645addf05f8f1c50... or http://gitorious.org/context/context/commit/06c7a7fdaac34512cdc3ff250dec5b1a... that's not able to display any given diff of ConTeXt releases) Go figure. There's nothing obviously math-related in there at all. Mojca

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Mojca Miklavec

10:13 p.m.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35 https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce... In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back. Mojca

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

10:39 p.m.

On 25-5-2012 00:13, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35

https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce...

In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back.

something math_operator_size and/or DisplayOPeratorMinHEight (btw, did you stop pushing betas in that hub?) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Aditya Mahajan

10:43 p.m.

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:

On 25-5-2012 00:13, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35

https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce...

In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back.

something math_operator_size and/or DisplayOPeratorMinHEight

It's more complicated because tx-fonts behaves correctly. Aditya

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

25 May 25 May

8:55 a.m.

On 25-5-2012 00:43, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

It's more complicated because tx-fonts behaves correctly.

indeed, and I always thought that these fonts were similar in setup Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Tim Steenvoorden

27 May 27 May

3:16 p.m.

Still get a small integral sign in the latest beta (2012.05.26 16:40). Times works perfectly. Am I doing something wrong here? \definetypeface[palatino][rm][serif][palatino] \definetypeface[palatino][mm][math][palatino] \setupbodyfont[palatino] \starttext \startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula \stoptext Cheers, Tim 2012/5/25 Hans Hagen :

On 25-5-2012 00:43, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
It's more complicated because tx-fonts behaves correctly.

indeed, and I always thought that these fonts were similar in setup

Hans

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

luigi scarso

3:31 p.m.

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

Still get a small integral sign in the latest beta (2012.05.26 16:40). Times works perfectly. Am I doing something wrong here?

\definetypeface[palatino][rm][serif][palatino] \definetypeface[palatino][mm][math][palatino]

\setupbodyfont[palatino]

\starttext

\startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula

\stoptext confirmed (again) -- luigi

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

luigi scarso

5:50 p.m.

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:31 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

...
Still get a small integral sign in the latest beta (2012.05.26 16:40). Times works perfectly. Am I doing something wrong here?

\definetypeface[palatino][rm][serif][palatino] \definetypeface[palatino][mm][math][palatino]

\setupbodyfont[palatino]

\starttext

\startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula

\stoptext confirmed (again) Stupid question: why we are not using texgyrepagella-math-regular.otf ?

-- luigi

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

luigi scarso

11:16 p.m.

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:31 PM, luigi scarso wrote:

...
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:

...
Still get a small integral sign in the latest beta (2012.05.26 16:40). Times works perfectly. Am I doing something wrong here?

\definetypeface[palatino][rm][serif][palatino] \definetypeface[palatino][mm][math][palatino]

\setupbodyfont[palatino]

\starttext

\startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula

\stoptext confirmed (again) Stupid question: why we are not using texgyrepagella-math-regular.otf ?

-- luigi

Different, but still wrong \unprotect \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] \definefontsynonym [PalatinoMath] [\s!file:texgyrepagella-math-regular.otf] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!name] \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [PalatinoMath] [\s!features=\s!math\mathsizesuffix] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [PalatinoTest] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!rm] [\s!serif] [palatino] [\s!default] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!mm] [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!default] \quittypescriptscanning \stoptypescript \protect \usetypescript[PalatinoTest] \setupbodyfont[PalatinoTest,12pt] \starttext \input knuth \par \startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula \stoptext -- luigi

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Aditya Mahajan

11:27 p.m.

On Mon, 28 May 2012, luigi scarso wrote:

Different, but still wrong

\unprotect \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] \definefontsynonym [PalatinoMath] [\s!file:texgyrepagella-math-regular.otf] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!name] \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [PalatinoMath] [\s!features=\s!math\mathsizesuffix] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [PalatinoTest] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!rm] [\s!serif] [palatino] [\s!default] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!mm] [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!default] \quittypescriptscanning \stoptypescript \protect

\usetypescript[PalatinoTest] \setupbodyfont[PalatinoTest,12pt] \starttext \input knuth \par \startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula \stoptext

In this case \int and \sum are of the same size, so it appears as a design choice, and more importantly, we can patch the font to change DisplayOperatorMinHeight. BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math? Should we default to that instead of px-fonts? Aditya

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Steve Peter

28 May 28 May

1:29 a.m.

On May 27, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math?

Nearly complete from what I hear. Steve

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Herbert Voss

29 May 29 May

8:43 a.m.

Steve Peter schrieb:

On May 27, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math?

Nearly complete from what I hear.

it is available from CTAN: http://CTAN.ORG/tex-archive/fonts/tex-gyre-math Herbert

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Tim Steenvoorden

9:04 a.m.

The integral sign is now big enough, but spacing between the sign and its bounds is too large... (In the px-font.) Cheers, Tim 2012/5/29 Herbert Voss :

Steve Peter schrieb:

...
On May 27, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math?

Nearly complete from what I hear.

it is available from CTAN: http://CTAN.ORG/tex-archive/fonts/tex-gyre-math

Herbert

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Tim Steenvoorden

9:15 a.m.

The same is true for other mathfonts discussed in the thread "Math fonts in TeXLive 2012". Cheers, Tim 2012/5/29 Tim Steenvoorden :

The integral sign is now big enough, but spacing between the sign and its bounds is too large... (In the px-font.)

Cheers, Tim

2012/5/29 Herbert Voss :

...
Steve Peter schrieb:

...
On May 27, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math?

Nearly complete from what I hear.

it is available from CTAN: http://CTAN.ORG/tex-archive/fonts/tex-gyre-math

Herbert

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Mojca Miklavec

28 May 28 May

5:27 a.m.

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math? Should we default to that instead of px-fonts?

Pagella didn't get much testing so far, it has not even been imported into TeX Live yet and it didn't get on CTAN yet. There are some known issues (Hans wrote some workarounds, but from what Khaled wrote LuaLaTeX still bails out.) I would prefer to have support for px fixed (which probably has to be done anyway) and switch to pagella soon after TL freeze, rather then get completely unexpected surprizes. Mojca

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

12:50 p.m.

On 28-5-2012 01:27, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Mon, 28 May 2012, luigi scarso wrote:

...
Different, but still wrong

\unprotect \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] \definefontsynonym [PalatinoMath] [\s!file:texgyrepagella-math-regular.otf] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!name] \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [PalatinoMath] [\s!features=\s!math\mathsizesuffix] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [PalatinoTest] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!rm] [\s!serif] [palatino] [\s!default] \definetypeface [\typescriptone] [\s!mm] [\s!math] [palatinomath] [\s!default] \quittypescriptscanning \stoptypescript \protect

\usetypescript[PalatinoTest] \setupbodyfont[PalatinoTest,12pt] \starttext \input knuth \par \startformula \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{x} {\rm d} x \stopformula \stoptext

In this case \int and \sum are of the same size, so it appears as a design choice, and more importantly, we can patch the font to change DisplayOperatorMinHeight.

It's really weird ... in the virtual font builder we have DisplayOperatorMinHeight = t . math_operator_size . text_style and there has been a good reason for this otherwise it would not be there. For the normal (12pt) size this becomes 1040448 for px as well as tx. Both fonts (when looking at them with \showfont[pxex.tfm] etc have the same shapes. Concerning the rest of the parameters, only for this case irrelevant differ a bit. % name px tx % RadicalRuleThickness 46399 44040 2359 % FractionDenominatorDisplayStyleGapMin 139197 132120 7077 % OverbarVerticalGap 139197 132120 7077 % RadicalDisplayStyleVerticalGap 133103 130744 2359 % UnderbarVerticalGap 139197 132120 7077 % FractionNumeratorGapMin 46399 44040 2359 % OverbarRuleThickness 46399 44040 2359 % StackGapMin 139197 132120 7077 % RadicalVerticalGap 57998.75 55050 2948.75 % StackDisplayStyleGapMin 324793 308280 16513 % AccentBaseHeight 353107.968 353894.4 -786.43200000003 % FractionRuleThickness 46399 44040 2359 % FractionDenominatorGapMin 46399 44040 2359 % OverbarExtraAscender 46399 44040 2359 % SubSuperscriptGapMin 185596 176160 9436 % MinConnectorOverlap 11599.75 11010 589.75 % FractionNumeratorDisplayStyleGapMin 139197 132120 7077 % UnderbarRuleThickness 46399 44040 2359 % RadicalExtraAscender 46399 44040 2359 So, there is no real reason for px to behave different than tx. However, when we nil DisplayOperatorMinHeight we get the scaled glyph. Okay, we could have threshold issue but even putting some real large math mess after itm it will not bump to the next size shape (there is only one larger size btw) .. puzzling

BTW, what is the status of Pagella Math? Should we default to that instead of px-fonts?

not yet Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Aditya Mahajan

24 May 24 May

10:40 p.m.

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35

https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce...

In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back.

I tested with asana, hoping that opentype fonts will behave better, but asana is hopelessly broken in the other direction: too big integrals and sums. To fix asana, change DisplayOperatorMinHeight = more, to DisplayOperatorMinHeight = 0, (or just comment it) in asana-math.lfg. After that, you can at least use asana math as a work around. Euler and Stix fonts work OK, and surprisingly so is txfonts! I thought that px- and tx-fonts were handled identically. Why does the bug only appear with px-fonts? Comparing the two files, I noticed that skewchar is not set in px fonts. Line 22 of px-math.lfg should be: { name = "texgyrepagella-bold.otf", vector = "tex-bf", skewchar=0x7F } , (but even after that change $\hat {\bi A}$ is set incorrectly). Aditya

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

11:13 p.m.

Hi Khaled, just checking ... did the code related to display operator heights change as part of the math cleanup? Hans On 25-5-2012 00:40, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35

https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce...

In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back.

I tested with asana, hoping that opentype fonts will behave better, but asana is hopelessly broken in the other direction: too big integrals and sums. To fix asana, change

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = more,

to

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = 0,

(or just comment it) in asana-math.lfg. After that, you can at least use asana math as a work around.

Euler and Stix fonts work OK, and surprisingly so is txfonts! I thought that px- and tx-fonts were handled identically. Why does the bug only appear with px-fonts?

Comparing the two files, I noticed that skewchar is not set in px fonts. Line 22 of px-math.lfg should be:

{ name = "texgyrepagella-bold.otf", vector = "tex-bf", skewchar=0x7F } ,

(but even after that change $\hat {\bi A}$ is set incorrectly).

Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Khaled Hosny

25 May 25 May

2:17 a.m.

AFAIK, no. The code that handles extensible delimiters changed, but IIUC we are not talking about extensible symbol here. Regards, Khaled On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:13:10AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:

Hi Khaled,

just checking ... did the code related to display operator heights change as part of the math cleanup?

Hans

On 25-5-2012 00:40, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

...
Any idea when this was introduced (or if this bug was always present)?

beta 2011.07.14 16:09

Oh, I'm sorry, nonsense. That was the last working one. The one introducing the bug was 2011.07.19 10:35

https://github.com/mojca/context/commit/a3f9fa299ecc3c9d8c3989c6e219dd9a1bce...

In that version the functionality was completely broken (overlapping limits), then it improved with time a bit, but never recovered properly back.

I tested with asana, hoping that opentype fonts will behave better, but asana is hopelessly broken in the other direction: too big integrals and sums. To fix asana, change

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = more,

to

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = 0,

(or just comment it) in asana-math.lfg. After that, you can at least use asana math as a work around.

Euler and Stix fonts work OK, and surprisingly so is txfonts! I thought that px- and tx-fonts were handled identically. Why does the bug only appear with px-fonts?

Comparing the two files, I noticed that skewchar is not set in px fonts. Line 22 of px-math.lfg should be:

{ name = "texgyrepagella-bold.otf", vector = "tex-bf", skewchar=0x7F } ,

(but even after that change $\hat {\bi A}$ is set incorrectly).

Aditya ___________________________________________________________________________________

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

--

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Hans Hagen

8:55 a.m.

On 25-5-2012 00:40, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

I tested with asana, hoping that opentype fonts will behave better, but asana is hopelessly broken in the other direction: too big integrals and sums. To fix asana, change

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = more,

to

DisplayOperatorMinHeight = 0,

fixed

{ name = "texgyrepagella-bold.otf", vector = "tex-bf", skewchar=0x7F } ,

(but even after that change $\hat {\bi A}$ is set incorrectly).

fixed ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4590

Age (days ago)

4599

Last active (days ago)

Download

24 comments

8 participants

tags

participants (8)

Aditya Mahajan
Hans Hagen
Herbert Voss
Khaled Hosny
luigi scarso
Mojca Miklavec
Steve Peter
Tim Steenvoorden