Hello, I am using Palatino to typeset my document and it involves a fair use of maths typesetting, and seems Palatino is incomplete for some of it. I've read about the MathPazo LaTeX package and about previous discussions about it in this list, but nothing conclusive. Anything anyone would recommend to typeset math with Palatino without any sort of Caveat? Thanks, Pepe
On 9/6/06, Pepe Barbe
Hello,
I am using Palatino to typeset my document and it involves a fair use of maths typesetting, and seems Palatino is incomplete for some of it.
I've read about the MathPazo LaTeX package and about previous discussions about it in this list, but nothing conclusive.
Anything anyone would recommend to typeset math with Palatino without any sort of Caveat?
Thanks, Pepe
That must be some heavy maths if Palatino out of the box can't do it. It makes use of the pxfonts set for math which is very complete, including everything the amsfonts contain and more besides. Certainly more complete than MathPazo IIRC. Steve -- Steve Grathwohl || Digital Content Developer Duke University Press Journals || +1 919 687 3634 905 W Main St || Durham, NC 27701 USA sgrathwohl@dukeupress.edu
On 9/6/06, Steve Grathwohl
That must be some heavy maths if Palatino out of the box can't do it. It makes use of the pxfonts set for math which is very complete, including everything the amsfonts contain and more besides. Certainly more complete than MathPazo IIRC.
They are not that complicated but I need to use Bold a lot for Matrices and Vectors. AFAIK, and in my experiments not all glyphs worked as bold when doing math. I don't know if I am calling palatino correctly or what. I understood that I could get bold through MathPazo. Pepe
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Pepe Barbe wrote:
On 9/6/06, Steve Grathwohl
wrote: That must be some heavy maths if Palatino out of the box can't do it. It makes use of the pxfonts set for math which is very complete, including everything the amsfonts contain and more besides. Certainly more complete than MathPazo IIRC.
They are not that complicated but I need to use Bold a lot for Matrices and Vectors. AFAIK, and in my experiments not all glyphs worked as bold when doing math. I don't know if I am calling palatino correctly or what. I understood that I could get bold through MathPazo.
How do you call bold? ConTeXt's inbuilt support for bold math does not work in all situations. Check the wiki for a \hbox workaround and see if that helps. Aditya
participants (3)
-
Aditya Mahajan
-
Pepe Barbe
-
Steve Grathwohl