Hi, is it possible to apply a processor to an index sub-entry? \index{Modules+\type{filter}} looks good, but "filter" is sorted under "type". \defineprocessor[type][style=mono] \index{Modules+type->filter} results in a "Modules / type->filter" entry. \index[Modules+filter]{Modules+\type{filter}} works and looks good, but the code feels bad… Hraban
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 05.07.2024 um 22:36:
Hi, is it possible to apply a processor to an index sub-entry?
\index{Modules+\type{filter}} looks good, but "filter" is sorted under "type".
\defineprocessor[type][style=mono] \index{Modules+type->filter} results in a "Modules / type->filter" entry.
\index[Modules+filter]{Modules+\type{filter}} works and looks good, but the code feels bad…
1. Complete your example to test them without adding stuff. 2. Use \setregisterentry which allows you to set processors for each entry level. \defineprocessor[type][style=mono] \starttext xxx\setregisterentry[index][entries:1=Modules,entries:2=filter,processors:2=type] \placeindex[n=1] \stoptext Wolfgang
Am 07.07.24 um 18:01 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 05.07.2024 um 22:36:
Hi, is it possible to apply a processor to an index sub-entry?
\index{Modules+\type{filter}} looks good, but "filter" is sorted under "type".
\defineprocessor[type][style=mono] \index{Modules+type->filter} results in a "Modules / type->filter" entry.
\index[Modules+filter]{Modules+\type{filter}} works and looks good, but the code feels bad…
1. Complete your example to test them without adding stuff.
Sorry.
2. Use \setregisterentry which allows you to set processors for each entry level.
\defineprocessor[type][style=mono]
\starttext
xxx\setregisterentry[index][entries:1=Modules,entries:2=filter,processors:2=type]
Oh wow, another command that I didn’t know. Might make sense to use in macros or automated setups. Thank you! Hraban
participants (2)
-
Henning Hraban Ramm -
Wolfgang Schuster