Re: [NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)
Hi Hans,
First and foremost: Thank you for uploading the Beta! This solves the
problem I have reported with \reference and focus=standard:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg79620.html
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:00 PM Hans Hagen
...
I agree with you and Pablo: the ISO standard is what counts. And I believe that named destinations, their use, and viewer behavior is described there clearly. ... so one handicap for me is that i won't make test docs for it
I will try to provide minimal examples that I believe are so common that the viewer behavior should be clear. ...
I believe that many people have to make compromises, e.g., cannot afford the time or money to produce both a screen version and a print version of a document. I believe that the fit-width mode is a good compromise - as long as it is viewed in "continuous" viewing mode. ...
I agree with you about footnotes. And, as mentioned above, I will try to come up with decent example documents. There are still cases in my documents that don't work and i will try to minimize these. Thanks again for your effort! Christoph
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:30:25 +0000
Christoph Reller
As a reader (of bound books), I very much prefer footnotes (at the bottom of the printed page) to endnotes. I actually read footnotes so shuffling back and forth between sections of the book can be a pain. Of course, this is not the case for on-screen readers. Reading on a screen one can have two approaches: either it is like reading a book (in which case I like to use dual mode on a large screen) or else one is reading a screen document in a continuous scroll mode (in which case pages including headers and footers make no sense). Using this second approach, footnotes must be used as endnotes, but not in the first approach. Alan
participants (2)
-
Alan BRASLAU -
Christoph Reller