Hello, I know that people would usually use \type{email@address.com}, but I must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt? The following definition in ec (and probably some other encodings) as well as in char-def.lua \definecharacter textat 64 might be handy. Mojca
On 14-2-2010 14:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I know that people would usually use \type{email@address.com}, but I must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt?
well, @ normally works quite ok so i never felt the need for a \textat (or \texta \textb \textc) for mkii just adding it to enco-def.mkii is anough as i it sits in the same spot in all encodings Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (3)
-
Hans Hagen -
Mojca Miklavec -
Wolfgang Schuster