Hi, I uploaded a new lmtx. This one is a little experimental because I removed so redundant / intermediate code still present from teh transition from mkiv to lmtx (mostly backend related). I might have missed something (not all is in the test suite) but nothing that can't be fixed easy, most has to do with the timing of definitions. But I assume users save their stable trees anyway ... (rpi bins should be in sync too.) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Am 18.10.2021 um 23:17 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context
: Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. This one is a little experimental because I removed so redundant / intermediate code still present from teh transition from mkiv to lmtx (mostly backend related). I might have missed something (not all is in the test suite) but nothing that can't be fixed easy, most has to do with the timing of definitions.
But I assume users save their stable trees anyway …
Of course we do, especially after Hraban recommended the 2021-10-10 tree last week. Just one question: LMTX comes with an empty texmf-modules tree. Are we still supposed to copy the context version? There have been updates to letter, filter and some others lately. That means we have to update the context tree as well. Do you plan to include this tree in the future? Greetings Axel PS: I tested one document with the new version without problems.
On 10/19/2021 8:43 AM, Axel Kielhorn via ntg-context wrote:
Am 18.10.2021 um 23:17 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context
: Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. This one is a little experimental because I removed so redundant / intermediate code still present from teh transition from mkiv to lmtx (mostly backend related). I might have missed something (not all is in the test suite) but nothing that can't be fixed easy, most has to do with the timing of definitions.
But I assume users save their stable trees anyway …
Of course we do, especially after Hraban recommended the 2021-10-10 tree last week.
Just one question:
LMTX comes with an empty texmf-modules tree. Are we still supposed to copy the context version?
There have been updates to letter, filter and some others lately. That means we have to update the context tree as well.
Do you plan to include this tree in the future?
at some point yes, but then we can also sync from the garden server (on the todo list) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 10/18/21 11:17 PM, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. This one is a little experimental because I removed so redundant / intermediate code still present from teh transition from mkiv to lmtx (mostly backend related). I might have missed something (not all is in the test suite) but nothing that can't be fixed easy, most has to do with the timing of definitions.
But I assume users save their stable trees anyway ...
Hi Hans, I’m afraid that viewerlayers have issues now. I hope I’ll find some time soon to write a minimal sample. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk
participants (3)
-
Axel Kielhorn
-
Hans Hagen
-
Pablo Rodriguez