Dear all, I am having problems with subformulas. The following example does not display a subnumber (i.e. I get (1) and (2) instead of (1a) and (1b)): %%%%%%%%%%%%% start example %%%%%%%%%%%% \starttext % from % does not display "subformula numbers"" \placesubformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula %%%%%%%%%%%%% stop example %%%%%%%%%%%%% This example is taken from http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf page 6 I am not quite sure for how long this is not working. I have been using the following alternative, which used to work but now gives me an error with the latest beta (ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.16 22:20 MKIV fmt: 2012.8.18): %%%%%%%%%%%%% start example %%%%%%%%%%%% % the following used to work in an earlier version \startsubformulas[eq:ax=b] \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%%% stop example %%%%%%%%%%%%% Any suggestions? Cheers, Andreas
sorry... the error message is: TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [ ... \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi \strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering ..._numbering \fi Am Aug 18, 2012 um 9:01 PM schrieb Andreas Mang:
Dear all,
I am having problems with subformulas.
The following example does not display a subnumber (i.e. I get (1) and (2) instead of (1a) and (1b)):
%%%%%%%%%%%%% start example %%%%%%%%%%%% \starttext % from % does not display "subformula numbers"" \placesubformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula %%%%%%%%%%%%% stop example %%%%%%%%%%%%%
This example is taken from http://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf page 6
I am not quite sure for how long this is not working. I have been using the following alternative, which used to work but now gives me an error with the latest beta (ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.16 22:20 MKIV fmt: 2012.8.18):
%%%%%%%%%%%%% start example %%%%%%%%%%%% % the following used to work in an earlier version \startsubformulas[eq:ax=b] \placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext %%%%%%%%%%%%% stop example %%%%%%%%%%%%%
Any suggestions?
Cheers, Andreas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
-- Andreas Mang, MSc Research Associate UNIVERSITY OF LUEBECK INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING Division of Computer Science, Engineering and Natural Sciences Ratzeburger Allee 160, Building 64 23562 Luebeck, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 451 500 5416 Fax: +49 (0) 451 500 5403 mang@imt.uni-luebeck.de http://www.imt.uni-luebeck.de
On 18-8-2012 21:04, Andreas Mang wrote:
\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]
\placeformula \startformula \startalign \NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a] \NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b] \stopalign \stopformula \stoptext
You can put this in cont-new.mkiv (after \unprotect): \def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering {\let\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering\relax % else error \doiftextelse\currentsubformulasuffix {\strc_counters_setown_sub\v!formula\plustwo\currentsubformulasuffix} {\strc_counters_increment_sub\v!formula\plustwo}% \placecurrentformulanumber} -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Am Aug 19, 2012 um 11:55 AM schrieb Hans Hagen:
You can put this in cont-new.mkiv (after \unprotect):
\def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering {\let\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering\relax % else error \doiftextelse\currentsubformulasuffix {\strc_counters_setown_sub\v!formula\plustwo\currentsubformulasuffix} {\strc_counters_increment_sub\v!formula\plustwo}% \placecurrentformulanumber}
Thanks Hans! Works nicely (as always). Just as minor comment in case someone faces the same problem: There's already a \def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering in cont-new.mkiv (line 36; ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.16 22:20 MKIV fmt: 2012.8.21). So to make this fix work I had to redefine / replace the original command instead of just putting it there. Cheers, Andreas
participants (2)
-
Andreas Mang -
Hans Hagen