Hi all, has \startregister been superseded in luametatex or is it not yet implemented? I tried to read strc-reg.lmt but couldn't figure out what is going on. The following silly minimal test produces the expected result with mkiv but not in mkxl. All best Thomas \setuppapersize [A6] \starttext A\index{A} B\startregister [index] [B] {B} \dorecurse {10} {\input tufte} A\index{A} B\stopregister [index] [B] \page \placeregister[index] \stoptext
Am 25.04.24 um 15:44 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
Hi all,
has \startregister been superseded in luametatex or is it not yet implemented? I tried to read strc-reg.lmt but couldn't figure out what is going on. The following silly minimal test produces the expected result with mkiv but not in mkxl.
All best
Thomas
\setuppapersize [A6]
\starttext A\index{A} B\startregister [index] [B] {B} \dorecurse {10} {\input tufte} A\index{A} B\stopregister [index] [B]
\page
\placeregister[index]
\stoptext
I’m using it like \startregister[index][bibliografie]{Bibliografie} … \stopregister[index][bibliografie] i.e. very similar to your example, and can confirm it doesn’t result in a page range in the index. Also gives no error. Hraban
On 4/25/24 16:13, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
I’m using it like
\startregister[index][bibliografie]{Bibliografie} … \stopregister[index][bibliografie]
i.e. very similar to your example, and can confirm it doesn’t result in a page range in the index. Also gives no error.
Since I've become an expert on tuc files since yesterday (ha!): if I compare the tuc from a mkiv and a mkxl run, I see that mkiv produces an entry ["lastrealpage"]=9 in the references table, mkxl doesn't. This appears to be the relevant bit, and it is connected with the replacement of realpageno by c_realpageno in line 638 of strc-reg.lmt references.lastrealpage = texgetcount(c_realpageno) But that's as far as I could get... Thomas
On 25 Apr 2024, at 16:45, Thomas A. Schmitz
wrote: On 4/25/24 16:13, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
I’m using it like \startregister[index][bibliografie]{Bibliografie} … \stopregister[index][bibliografie] i.e. very similar to your example, and can confirm it doesn’t result in a page range in the index. Also gives no error.
Since I've become an expert on tuc files since yesterday (ha!): if I compare the tuc from a mkiv and a mkxl run, I see that mkiv produces an entry ["lastrealpage"]=9 in the references table, mkxl doesn't. This appears to be the relevant bit, and it is connected with the replacement of realpageno by c_realpageno in line 638 of strc-reg.lmt
references.lastrealpage = texgetcount(c_realpageno)
Possibly related: I noticed last week that mkxl does not update the legacy counter \pageno any more for every page. Best wishes, Taco — Taco Hoekwater E: taco@bittext.nl genderfluid (all pronouns)
On 4/25/2024 4:51 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 25 Apr 2024, at 16:45, Thomas A. Schmitz
wrote: On 4/25/24 16:13, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
I’m using it like \startregister[index][bibliografie]{Bibliografie} … \stopregister[index][bibliografie] i.e. very similar to your example, and can confirm it doesn’t result in a page range in the index. Also gives no error.
Since I've become an expert on tuc files since yesterday (ha!): if I compare the tuc from a mkiv and a mkxl run, I see that mkiv produces an entry ["lastrealpage"]=9 in the references table, mkxl doesn't. This appears to be the relevant bit, and it is connected with the replacement of realpageno by c_realpageno in line 638 of strc-reg.lmt
references.lastrealpage = texgetcount(c_realpageno)
Let's seen if we can make Thomas more of an expert as he's zooming in on the issue: extendregister { metadata = { name = name }, references = { abel = label }, } Let me know if you't see it.
Possibly related: I noticed last week that mkxl does not update the legacy counter \pageno any more for every page. i'll check it
Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On 4/25/24 18:16, Hans Hagen wrote:
Let's seen if we can make Thomas more of an expert as he's zooming in on the issue:
extendregister { metadata = { name = name }, references = { abel = label }, }
Let me know if you't see it.
Ah, simple typo! After fixing abel to label, startregister gives the expected results again! Thanks Hans! I may be back with more register questions soon... Thomas
On 4/25/24 6:27 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Ah, simple typo! After fixing abel to label, startregister gives the expected results again! Thanks Hans! I may be back with more register questions soon...
And here I am again! Both in mkiv and in mkxl, start/stopregister does not work when there is already an index entry before. Example below! All best Thomas \setuppapersize [A6] \starttext A\index{A} B \page A\startregister [index] {A} B\startregister [index] [B] {B} \dorecurse {10} {\input tufte} A\stopregister [index] {A} B\stopregister [index] [B] \page \placeregister[index] \stoptext
On 4/26/24 9:30 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
And here I am again! Both in mkiv and in mkxl, start/stopregister does not work when there is already an index entry before. Example below!
All best
Thomas
\setuppapersize [A6]
\starttext A\index{A} B \page A\startregister [index] {A} B\startregister [index] [B] {B} \dorecurse {10} {\input tufte} A\stopregister [index] {A} B\stopregister [index] [B]
\page
\placeregister[index]
\stoptext
And I'm not even sure if this is allowed to say anymore, but: works in mkii... Thomas
On 4/26/2024 9:54 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 4/26/24 9:30 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
And here I am again! Both in mkiv and in mkxl, start/stopregister does not work when there is already an index entry before. Example below!
All best
Thomas
\setuppapersize [A6]
\starttext A\index{A} B \page A\startregister [index] {A} B\startregister [index] [B] {B} \dorecurse {10} {\input tufte} A\stopregister [index] {A} B\stopregister [index] [B]
\page
\placeregister[index]
\stoptext
And I'm not even sure if this is allowed to say anymore, but: works in mkii... That's because mkii is AI enhanced. Can you try this:
On 4/26/24 10:22 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
That's because mkii is AI enhanced. Can you try this:
Ah, I see where I was wrong, thank you! I'm mapping from xml, so I became confused with the optional parameters that I write as attributes, with a number of ifs... But now it should be clear! All best Thomas
participants (4)
-
Hans Hagen
-
Henning Hraban Ramm
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Thomas A. Schmitz