A doubt while compiling modules
With $>texmfstart texexec --pdf --modules font-chi I have font-chi.pdf and no errors. But, the cover is... well, white: ie there are no more 'random box' I was used to see. Nothing to wrong "di per se" (time to make pdf is lesser so it's good), but I usually see it as a configuration error. (see www.logosrl.it/context/modules/2007-02-21/singles/font-chi.pdf ) I use last pdftex, last lm fonts, last context distro. luigi PS [OT] font-chi has some chines fonts (cfr www.logosrl.it/context/modules/chinesecontext.zip) Is there any example of arabic under base/ ?
luigi scarso wrote:
With $>texmfstart texexec --pdf --modules font-chi I have font-chi.pdf and no errors. But, the cover is... well, white: ie there are no more 'random box' I was used to see.
Probably your system has a configuration error with metapost. I cannot compile the file due to missing fonts, but the first page looks ok here, including graphics. What is your metapost version? Cheers, Taco
On 3/7/07, Taco Hoekwater
luigi scarso wrote:
With $>texmfstart texexec --pdf --modules font-chi But, the cover is... well, white: ie there are no more 'random box' I was used to see.
Probably your system has a configuration error with metapost. I cannot compile the file due to missing fonts, www.logosrl.it/context/modules/chinesecontext.zip
but the first page looks ok here, including graphics. Here too with 2007-02-20
What is your metapost version? $>mpost This is MetaPost, Version 0.901 (Web2C 7.5.5)
luigi scarso wrote:
On 3/7/07, Taco Hoekwater
wrote: luigi scarso wrote:
With $>texmfstart texexec --pdf --modules font-chi But, the cover is... well, white: ie there are no more 'random box' I was used to see.
Probably your system has a configuration error with metapost. I cannot compile the file due to missing fonts, www.logosrl.it/context/modules/chinesecontext.zip
but the first page looks ok here, including graphics. Here too with 2007-02-20
What is your metapost version? $>mpost This is MetaPost, Version 0.901 (Web2C 7.5.5)
It will work better with metapost 0.99x, definately. There is one included on TeXLive 2007, otherwise: https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost Cheers, Taco
It will work better with metapost 0.99x, definately. There is one included on TeXLive 2007, otherwise:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost ok, i will try 0.994-beta .
On 3/7/07, luigi scarso
It will work better with metapost 0.99x, definately. There is one included on TeXLive 2007, otherwise:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost ok, i will try 0.994-beta .
even with update no news. time to change to texlive2007 ?
luigi scarso wrote:
On 3/7/07, luigi scarso
wrote: It will work better with metapost 0.99x, definately. There is one included on TeXLive 2007, otherwise:
https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/metapost ok, i will try 0.994-beta .
even with update no news. time to change to texlive2007 ?
possibly. No errors or anything in the log? Taco
participants (2)
-
luigi scarso
-
Taco Hoekwater