Patrick et al, I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine. But not with my Context. I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months, and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has changed. The only change is that I updated Context with ctxtools --update from the Scite menu. I don't know which of my definitions or setups could cause this. I am not using \setupitemize. I hope someone can help. Kind regards Wim
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, w.neimeijer@hccnet.nl wrote:
Patrick et al,
I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine. But not with my Context.
I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months, and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has changed. The only change is that I updated Context with ctxtools --update from the Scite menu.
I don't know which of my definitions or setups could cause this. I am not using \setupitemize. I hope someone can help.
There was some changes in itemize code recently. Hans added `reverse' option, so that \startitemize[n,reverse] \item one \item two \item three \stopitemize gives 3. one 2. two 1. three It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break. Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the problem reappears. That may help in figuring out if it is something wrong in your setup, or a bug. Aditya
participants (2)
-
Aditya Mahajan
-
w.neimeijerï¼ hccnet.nl