Am 28.09.2010 um 10:49 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:

Am 28.09.2010 um 10:37 schrieb Elias Oltmanns:

...

Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

Hi,

somewhere I saw the code how to insert a pagebreak in the table of content. I remember it somehow was related to the new structure model (one could specify after which sections the table should break).

\completecontent[pageboundaries={20.3,30}]

In current context it doesn't show any effect. Is it obsolete in MkIV? Steffen

Am 28.09.2010 um 11:35 schrieb Elias Oltmanns:

Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

Am 28.09.2010 um 10:49 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:

...

Am 28.09.2010 um 10:37 schrieb Elias Oltmanns:

...

Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

Hi,

somewhere I saw the code how to insert a pagebreak in the table of content. I remember it somehow was related to the new structure model (one could specify after which sections the table should break).

\completecontent[pageboundaries={20.3,30}]

In current context it doesn't show any effect.

It does here (updated minimals today) and in MkIV too. Do you have an example that doesn't work?

I'll send you some file privately. Steffen

Am 28.09.2010 um 12:33 schrieb Mari Voipio:

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:19, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

...

...

\completecontent[pageboundaries={20.3,30}]

In current context it doesn't show any effect. Is it obsolete in MkIV?

It works for me, even in the fairly complex files that I recently upgraded from MKII to MKIV. I would've gone back to using MKII if it didn't work...

BTW, my magic line is \placecontent[pageboundaries={5.2}]

(I do the TOC heading separately.)

I just tested it works, my ConTeXt is ver 2010.09.22.

If I use eg. pageboundaries={I.} it seems to work ... but: it works on *all* sections with "I."!! If I want to be more precise and use pageboundaries={B.I.} it does not show any effect. So my assumption is: the pageboundaires command only works if I have a full-path list, like this ... A. Test B. Test B.I. Test B.II. Test C. Test But mine looks like this: A. Test B. Test I. Test II. Test C. Test Am I right, that pageboundaries doesn't work with the second setup?! Steffen

Am 29.09.2010 um 10:55 schrieb Hans Hagen:

On 29-9-2010 9:22, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

Am 28.09.2010 um 12:33 schrieb Mari Voipio:

...

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:19, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:

...

...

...

\completecontent[pageboundaries={20.3,30}]

In current context it doesn't show any effect. Is it obsolete in MkIV?

It works for me, even in the fairly complex files that I recently upgraded from MKII to MKIV. I would've gone back to using MKII if it didn't work...

BTW, my magic line is \placecontent[pageboundaries={5.2}]

(I do the TOC heading separately.)

I just tested it works, my ConTeXt is ver 2010.09.22.

If I use eg. pageboundaries={I.} it seems to work ... but: it works on *all* sections with "I."!!

If I want to be more precise and use pageboundaries={B.I.} it does not show any effect.

So my assumption is: the pageboundaires command only works if I have a full-path list, like this ...

wrong assumption. the page boundary mechanism has never been adapted to the new structure code

so, I've decided to kick out pageboundaries and provide a more general mechanism

\definelistextra[page][before=\page,after=\page]

a very inspiring mechanism, great!

\starttext

\placelist[chapter,section][criterium=text,extras={1.1=page}]

\chapter{x1} \section{xx1} \section{xx2} \chapter{y2} \section{yy1} \section{yy2}

\stoptext

the specification passed in extras uses numbers i.e. no funny conversions and strips leading and trailing zero numbered sections.

:o) Steffen