Imaginary entity rendering in MathML
Hello, The following MathML test case (rec-arg1) using newmml does not render the imaginary entity ⅈ correctly. It is shown as a minus ("-") instead of "i". I have this behaviour for any test using this entity. <math> <apply> <arg/> <apply> <plus/> <ci> x </ci> <apply> <times/> <cn> ⅈ </cn> <ci> y </ci> </apply> </apply> </apply> </math> Regards, BG
nico wrote:
Hello,
The following MathML test case (rec-arg1) using newmml does not render the imaginary entity ⅈ correctly. It is shown as a minus ("-") instead of "i". I have this behaviour for any test using this entity.
I guess the problem is that the vector unic-033 (=hex 21) only defines the arrow part, that starts at 0x2190 ? Cheers, Taco
On 3/28/06, Taco Hoekwater
nico wrote:
The following MathML test case (rec-arg1) using newmml does not render the imaginary entity ⅈ correctly. It is shown as a minus ("-") instead of "i". I have this behaviour for any test using this entity.
I guess the problem is that the vector unic-033 (=hex 21) only defines the arrow part, that starts at 0x2190 ?
Probably. This vector is far from complete. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, but there simply isn't TeX equivalents for all symbols in that vector. At least not ones that I have been able to find. nikolai
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 3/28/06, Taco Hoekwater
wrote: nico wrote:
The following MathML test case (rec-arg1) using newmml does not render the imaginary entity ⅈ correctly. It is shown as a minus ("-") instead of "i". I have this behaviour for any test using this entity.
I guess the problem is that the vector unic-033 (=hex 21) only defines the arrow part, that starts at 0x2190 ?
Probably. This vector is far from complete. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, but there simply isn't TeX equivalents for all symbols in that vector. At least not ones that I have been able to find.
but imaginary i cum suis should be possible Hans -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen wrote:
Probably. This vector is far from complete. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, but there simply isn't TeX equivalents for all symbols in that vector. At least not ones that I have been able to find.
but imaginary i cum suis should be possible
They would need \definemathsymbol lines as well then, right? Cheers, Taco
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Probably. This vector is far from complete. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, but there simply isn't TeX equivalents for all symbols in that vector. At least not ones that I have been able to find.
but imaginary i cum suis should be possible
They would need \definemathsymbol lines as well then, right?
sure, they can be modeled after the x-newmme.tex entries Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:08:50 +0200, Hans Hagen
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
I guess the problem is that the vector unic-033 (=hex 21) only defines the arrow part, that starts at 0x2190 ?
Probably. This vector is far from complete. I've tried to be as thorough as possible, but there simply isn't TeX equivalents for all symbols in that vector. At least not ones that I have been able to find.
but imaginary i cum suis should be possible
If possible, the followings are useful too in math (at least there are used in the MathML suite ;-): ℏ "h" Planck's constant (\hslash in latex) ⅆ "d" for use in differentials ⅇ "e" exponential base Regards, BG
nico wrote:
If possible, the followings are useful too in math (at least there are used in the MathML suite ;-):
ℏ "h" Planck's constant (\hslash in latex) ⅆ "d" for use in differentials ⅇ "e" exponential base
There are quite a lot more that could be added easily. I'll try ... Cheers, taco
participants (4)
-
Hans Hagen
-
nico
-
Nikolai Weibull
-
Taco Hoekwater